1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The German counterpart to McGill Pain Questionnaire

Abstract: This study presents a German version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) developed by strict adherence to the methodology originally employed by Melzack and Torgerson. Three groups of subjects participated: The first group (n = 40) was used to construct a 5-point intensity scale. The second group (n = 42) was presented a preliminary translation of the MPQ and asked to assign an intensity rating out of the 5-point intensity scale to each of the 78 adjectives. In the last phase, adjectives whose mean ratings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
15

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
60
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The second scale was used to assess pain unpleasantness (Price et al, 1983), with 0 indicating ''neutral'' and 10 ''extremely unpleasant''. The German version (Stein and Mendl, 1988) of the MPQ was evaluated according to the methodology originally employed by Melzack and Togerson (Melzack, 1975).…”
Section: Subjective Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second scale was used to assess pain unpleasantness (Price et al, 1983), with 0 indicating ''neutral'' and 10 ''extremely unpleasant''. The German version (Stein and Mendl, 1988) of the MPQ was evaluated according to the methodology originally employed by Melzack and Togerson (Melzack, 1975).…”
Section: Subjective Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGill Pain Questionnaire German version (Melzack, 1975;Stein and Mendl, 1988). This questionnaire is composed of sensory, affective, evaluative word descriptors in the form of 78 words grouped into 20 subclasses used by patients to specify subjective pain experience and of a visual analogue pain scale for measurement of pain intensity.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study of Maihöfner et al even extended these findings, showing a shift of the cortical S1 representation of the affected hand toward the lip representation and establishing a correlation between the amount of cortical reorganization and the intensity of CRPS pain and the extent of mechanical hyperalgesia. In contrast to the previous MEG study, Maihöfner et al used the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess sensory, affective, and evaluative components of chronic pain, 25 instead of rating acute pain alone, which was not related to cortical reorganization. Other clinical features such as motor and autonomic symptoms, including misuse of the affected hand, did not correlate with the amount of cortical reorganization, emphasizing the impact of pain and hyperalgesia for these cortical phenomena.…”
Section: Somatosensory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%