2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “German Paradox” in the balancing power markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the demand for positive aFRR was approximately on the same level during the considered time period from January 2012 until December 2013 (Ocker & Ehrhart, ). Therefore, we assume that suppliers derive their subjective acceptance probability from the corresponding power price interval.…”
Section: Bidder's Decision‐theoretic Calculus For the Austrian And Gementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the demand for positive aFRR was approximately on the same level during the considered time period from January 2012 until December 2013 (Ocker & Ehrhart, ). Therefore, we assume that suppliers derive their subjective acceptance probability from the corresponding power price interval.…”
Section: Bidder's Decision‐theoretic Calculus For the Austrian And Gementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ocker et al () provide a game‐theoretic model for the current Austrian and German aFRR auction as well as for the proposed European‐wide aFRR auction. Furthermore, Ocker and Ehrhart () present empirical evidence for collusive behavior in the German balancing power markets, that is, suppliers coordinate on noncompetitive price levels. We relate to the latest literature and present an investigation of the Austrian and German aFRR auctions outcomes in the time span from January 2014 to May 2016.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In February 2016, Spain has become pioneer in this respect, by considering several WPPs participating in BMs (ACCIONA, ; Fernandes, Frías, & Reneses, ). Germany (Hirth & Ziegenhagen, ; Ocker & Ehrhart, ) and Denmark (Jansen, Speckmann, & Baier, ; Sorknaes, Andersen, Tang, & Strøm, ) have also allowed the participation of WPPs in BMs with some restrictions (only for downward mFRR). Skytte and Bobo () conducted a study for the year 2014 where WPPs can participate in the BMs of Denmark, obtaining an increase of 6.5% in the wind energy value.…”
Section: The Internal Market For Electricity: Potential Impact Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the technical feasibility of the participation of wind power producers in balancing markets, several authors acknowledge this possibility, in case the current market rules and product specifications are adapted (see, e.g., [18][19][20]). In this way, and although with some restrictions, notably the fact that WPPs need to prepare bids aggregated with conventional generation, Spain [18], Germany [19] and Denmark [20] have already allowed the participation of WPPs in BMs (although for downward regulation only).…”
Section: Status Of Some European Countries and Product Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%