1980
DOI: 10.1021/ma60074a045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Glass Transition Temperature of Polyethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
76
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the previous studies [6][7][8][9] for this model are at a temperature T = ε/k B > 2T g . This is comparable to experimental studies of many common polymers such as polyethylene, 32,33 polypropylene, 34 and polydimethysiloxane 35 which are often studied for T ∼ 2 − 3T g .…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus the previous studies [6][7][8][9] for this model are at a temperature T = ε/k B > 2T g . This is comparable to experimental studies of many common polymers such as polyethylene, 32,33 polypropylene, 34 and polydimethysiloxane 35 which are often studied for T ∼ 2 − 3T g .…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is the reason why, shift in the β-relaxation for PVDF ( Figure 6) may not be directly compared to the observations for the PVDF/CPL blends (Figures 7 and 8). Broadness of the β-transition of the unannealed PVDF has been proposed to reflect a large spectrum of constraints on the molecular mobility in the amorphous phase [31][32]. Figure 6 shows that annealing increases the asymmetry of the β-transition peak, to the point where it appears now to result from the overlap of two contributions tentatively assigned to the constrained chain segments (at ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…polyethylene (PE) and PVDF, is comparatively small, e.g. less than 10% in linear PE [22][23][24]. However, according to Loufakis and Wunderlich [25] there would be no detectable rigid amorphous component above the PVDF glass transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Tg of the blend with PS/TMPC = 10/90 w/w was 193 °C, 6°C higher than the prediction 1187 °C) of Equation (2) and 7 °C higher than the Tg (186 °C) of the same blend after annealing at 210 °C. This implies the existence of a second, PS-rich phase not revealed by the routine DSC scan, As has been shown by Gaur and Wunderlich [18], indistinct glass transitions of (micro)phase separated blend can be enhanced by inducing an excess enthalpy peak (i.e., the hysteresis peak due to physical aging [119]). This can be achieved by heating the sample at a rate faster than the previous cooling rate [18] or selective annealing of one or both phases below the corresponding Tg [20].…”
Section: Ps/tmpc Binary Blendsmentioning
confidence: 83%