2009
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2009/v32i2/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the base of the Danian Stage (Paleocene, Paleogene, “Tertiary”, Cenozoic): auxiliary sections and correlation

Abstract: Tunisia, Zumaya in Spain, Brazos in USA and Stevns Klint in Denmark), the chairwoman of the K/Pg Boundary Working Group submitted a written proposal to the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). The GSSP of the K/Pg boundary was defined at the base of the boundary clay at the section near El Kef, Tunisia. This proposal was approved by the ICS in 1990 and was ratified by the International Union of Geological Sciences in 1991. Nevertheless, its publication in a prestigious stratigraphical journal of wid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the seismic profiles, we have mapped the base of the post-impact Cenozoic sediments as the top of the K-Pg deposit. Although the formal boundary between the Cretaceous and the Paleogene is at the base of all impact-related deposits [Molina et al, 2006] that depth within the crater is difficult to determine precisely, and thus following the Schulte et al [2012] discussion of a proximal impact sequence in Mexico, we refer to the entire thickness of impact deposits below the post-impact Paleogene sediments as the K-Pg event deposit. Additionally, in ICDP drillsite Yax-1 located close to the crater rim but within the terrace zone ( Figure 2), Whalen et al [2013] observed significant sediment deformation structures for~100 m above the top of the K-Pg event deposit which lies at~795 m. These sedimentary structures above the K-Pg deposits in the core data suggest that sediment deformation was common and then episodic during the early Paleogene history within the terrace zone [Whalen et al, 2013].…”
Section: Terrace Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the seismic profiles, we have mapped the base of the post-impact Cenozoic sediments as the top of the K-Pg deposit. Although the formal boundary between the Cretaceous and the Paleogene is at the base of all impact-related deposits [Molina et al, 2006] that depth within the crater is difficult to determine precisely, and thus following the Schulte et al [2012] discussion of a proximal impact sequence in Mexico, we refer to the entire thickness of impact deposits below the post-impact Paleogene sediments as the K-Pg event deposit. Additionally, in ICDP drillsite Yax-1 located close to the crater rim but within the terrace zone ( Figure 2), Whalen et al [2013] observed significant sediment deformation structures for~100 m above the top of the K-Pg event deposit which lies at~795 m. These sedimentary structures above the K-Pg deposits in the core data suggest that sediment deformation was common and then episodic during the early Paleogene history within the terrace zone [Whalen et al, 2013].…”
Section: Terrace Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walliser 1984), it is generally easy to identify the K-Pg boundary in distal ma− rine successions, because it represents a sudden collapse of carbonate production, characterised by a thin ejecta−rich dark clay horizon (up to 10 cm thick; e.g., Smit 1999;Claeys et al 2002;Molina et al 2009;Schulte et al 2010). The strati− graphic continuity of many K-Pg successions is question− able (e.g., MacLeod 1995), and, therefore, correlation by im− pact evidence offers a specific chronostratigraphic tool (see Molina et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walliser 1984), it is generally easy to identify the K-Pg boundary in distal ma− rine successions, because it represents a sudden collapse of carbonate production, characterised by a thin ejecta−rich dark clay horizon (up to 10 cm thick; e.g., Smit 1999;Claeys et al 2002;Molina et al 2009;Schulte et al 2010). The strati− graphic continuity of many K-Pg successions is question− able (e.g., MacLeod 1995), and, therefore, correlation by im− pact evidence offers a specific chronostratigraphic tool (see Molina et al 2009). The preserved sedimentary record of a geologically instantaneous event, corresponding to the syn− chronous fallout of impact−related material that persisted at most several months for the finest, sub−micrometre iridium− rich stratospheric dust (Toon et al 1997; see also Kring 2007), is the best available proof of continuous record and eliminates the frequent ambiguity of biostratigraphic dating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these sites, latest Cretaceous strata are overlain by a relatively thin (<3 cm) [3], [4] boundary claystone with physical and chemical features indicative of impact ejecta [5][8]. The base of this layer is defined as the K/Pg boundary [9]. Analyses of faunal recovery in the earliest Paleocene often focus on vertebrate radiations, but it is difficult to reconstruct ecosystem structure during this interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%