2014
DOI: 10.1193/122013eqs297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Earthquake History

Abstract: The study of earthquakes from historical sources, or historical seismology, was considered an early priority for the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) project, which commissioned a study of historical seismicity on a global scale. This was the Global Earthquake History (GEH) project, led jointly by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV; Milan, Italy) and the British Geological Survey (BGS; UK). GEH was structured around three complementary deliverables: archive, catalog, and the Web infrastructu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Earthquakes of this magnitude size or larger are not unusual in stable continental regions, even in areas much further away from plate boundaries than the Apulia Swell, and represent a very elusive source of seismic risk (Albini et al, 2019;Calais et al, 2016;England & Jackson, 2011). Until now, the hypotheses about the source of this earthquake fell for different reasons onto a reverse fault, despite the presence of normal faults in the area.…”
Section: 1029/2020tc006116mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquakes of this magnitude size or larger are not unusual in stable continental regions, even in areas much further away from plate boundaries than the Apulia Swell, and represent a very elusive source of seismic risk (Albini et al, 2019;Calais et al, 2016;England & Jackson, 2011). Until now, the hypotheses about the source of this earthquake fell for different reasons onto a reverse fault, despite the presence of normal faults in the area.…”
Section: 1029/2020tc006116mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The megathrust faults depicted as black-toothed curves and the crustal faults plotted in blue are all considered as fault earthquake sources, while the crustal faults plotted in red are not. Also displayed are post-1990 Global CMT solutions for Mw ≥ 7, hypocenters from the ISC-GEM catalog with Mw ≥ 6.5 with a "≈" to indicate those which were tsunamigenic, and events from the GEM Historical Earthquake Archive (Albini et al 2014), all with depth ≤ 40 km. Green, magenta, and orange toothed curves denote the western, central and eastern sections, respectively, of the Ramu-Markham Fault.…”
Section: Subduction Megathrustsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). The m h is collected from three sources: the PAGER-CAT catalog (Allen et al, 2009), the Centennial catalog (Engdahl and Villaseñor, 2002), and the Global Large Historical Earthquake catalog (GLHECAT; Albini et al, 2014) by the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) project. For each event listed in the PAGER-CAT and Centennial catalogs, multiple magnitudes are reported, and a preferred magnitude is selected by the catalog authors.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%