Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The thirty-second anniversary of Ukraine regaining independence is a perfect reason to remember the historical economic changes in Ukraine. Without knowledge of history, it is difficult not only to understand the present, and predict, and effectively build the future, but also to raise an informed citizen and patriot of the Ukrainian state. The history of the Ukrainian socialist economy is a history of crises and reforms. The purpose of the proposed article is to try to answer the question: what was the process of implementing economic reforms in the Soviet Union and their impact on economic growth and development of Ukraine’s economy. None of these reforms changed it structurally because they did not aim to build a new economic order or transform the old one; their mission was to save the socialist economy. The chronological boundaries of the study cover the post-war reconstruction in the 1945–1950s, the reforming activities of Nikita Khrushchev, as well as the reforms of the 1960s–1970s. An important period of reform of the economic and political systems occurred in the 1980s. The bold economic and political reforms introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev were subsequently referred to as «perestroika» (reconstruction), «uskorenie» (acceleration), and «glasnost» (openness). However, these reform measures were generally late and failed to stabilize the economy, and even destabilized it. Repeated and ill-conceived reforms caused unexpected changes in the politics and economic system of the USSR. The slowdown of positive trends in the agricultural economy of Ukraine and the negative dynamics of industrial production proved the ineffectiveness of the reforms. For Ukraine, Soviet reforms meant consolidating the status of an integral part of the union economy. The ruling regime did not even allow a moment to think about liberalization or fundamental changes, consistently «tightening the screws» and strengthening the totalitarian order. Attempts to overcome economic stagnation without radical changes in the social order eventually led to its collapse.
The thirty-second anniversary of Ukraine regaining independence is a perfect reason to remember the historical economic changes in Ukraine. Without knowledge of history, it is difficult not only to understand the present, and predict, and effectively build the future, but also to raise an informed citizen and patriot of the Ukrainian state. The history of the Ukrainian socialist economy is a history of crises and reforms. The purpose of the proposed article is to try to answer the question: what was the process of implementing economic reforms in the Soviet Union and their impact on economic growth and development of Ukraine’s economy. None of these reforms changed it structurally because they did not aim to build a new economic order or transform the old one; their mission was to save the socialist economy. The chronological boundaries of the study cover the post-war reconstruction in the 1945–1950s, the reforming activities of Nikita Khrushchev, as well as the reforms of the 1960s–1970s. An important period of reform of the economic and political systems occurred in the 1980s. The bold economic and political reforms introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev were subsequently referred to as «perestroika» (reconstruction), «uskorenie» (acceleration), and «glasnost» (openness). However, these reform measures were generally late and failed to stabilize the economy, and even destabilized it. Repeated and ill-conceived reforms caused unexpected changes in the politics and economic system of the USSR. The slowdown of positive trends in the agricultural economy of Ukraine and the negative dynamics of industrial production proved the ineffectiveness of the reforms. For Ukraine, Soviet reforms meant consolidating the status of an integral part of the union economy. The ruling regime did not even allow a moment to think about liberalization or fundamental changes, consistently «tightening the screws» and strengthening the totalitarian order. Attempts to overcome economic stagnation without radical changes in the social order eventually led to its collapse.
In the conditions of war and post-war reconstruction, Ukraine’s further integration into the world economy and trade-economic cooperation with the EU, the USA, and other developed countries is a priority task. However, the Soviet economic heritage in the form of the extensive elements and forms of economic management continues to create obstacles to building a competitive model of foreign trade cooperation. And overcoming these obstacles is impossible without rethinking and evaluating the historical experience. The research’s aim is to summarize the determinants and structural-institutional characteristics of the model of Ukrainian international economic relations shaped within the Soviet economic system. The theoretical basis of the research includes the concepts of dependent development and the «track effect», which allow assessing the influence of the Soviet legacy on the modern economic processes. The research methodology is based on the systemic approach, and problem-logical, comparative, institutional, and statistical analysis. The author defines the institutional and structural characteristics of the Ukrainian model of international economic relations shaped within the Soviet economic space and outside it. These include the republic's lack of autonomy regarding foreign trade and its subordination to the state system of centralized export-import planning; absence of closed production and technological cycles within one republic and deepening of all-Union trade and economic integration; production specialization of regions according to the central interests; the dominance of trade with other socialist countries and the so-called countries of non-capitalist orientation; a high share of barter operations and compensatory cooperation aimed at strengthening the so-called socialist integration; and an active application of the policy of customs and trade protectionism in relation to countries with a market economy. It is confirmed that the place of Ukraine's economy in the Soviet Union’s division of labor and the system of foreign economic relations was determined by the republic’s political and economic dependence on the center and its subordination to the Soviet concept of building an all-Union economic space. This largely limited Ukraine's opportunities in the formation and implementation of its own strategies of foreign economic interaction and led to an inertial pursuit in the fairway of the post-Union political entities and economic agreements after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the first decades of Ukraine's state independence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.