2016
DOI: 10.1093/database/baw125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Standard specification

Abstract: Genomic samples of non-model organisms are becoming increasingly important in a broad range of studies from developmental biology, biodiversity analyses, to conservation. Genomic sample definition, description, quality, voucher information and metadata all need to be digitized and disseminated across scientific communities. This information needs to be concise and consistent in today’s ever-increasing bioinformatic era, for complementary data aggregators to easily map databases to one another. In order to faci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Darwin Core (Wieczorek et al 2012) and the GGBN data standard (Droege et al 2016) were used in the management and transfer of specimen and derived sample data between the central museum collections database, a molecular collections database and external repositories (e.g. GenBank, WoRMS, OBIS, GBIF, GGBN, ZooBank).…”
Section: Sampling Localities and Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darwin Core (Wieczorek et al 2012) and the GGBN data standard (Droege et al 2016) were used in the management and transfer of specimen and derived sample data between the central museum collections database, a molecular collections database and external repositories (e.g. GenBank, WoRMS, OBIS, GBIF, GGBN, ZooBank).…”
Section: Sampling Localities and Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org, Williams 2004), pathological specimens from diseased and also healthy wildlife are less common (although see González et al 2017 for a good example in fish). These resources, along with sufficient metadata (Droege et al 2016), are critical for the comparison of future samples with current specimens to evaluate pathogen prevalence and association with disease. Likewise, storage of various types of genomic data, such as sequence and expression data, in public databases (Duke and Porter 2013) could encourage and facilitate replication, follow-up studies, and development of results into application.…”
Section: Fostering An Environment For Practical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA extracts derived from the 1,500,003 barcoded specimens are held in the DNA Archive at the CBG, either within -80°C freezers or dried in a trehalose-based preservative and held in -20°C freezers. The specimen data and DNA storage information were submitted to the Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Portal [65] following the GGBN Data Standard [66]. The upload of CBG's DNA extract data added 566 families and 4,287 genera to GGBN, increasing the number of families and genera by 22% and 30%, respectively (based on an API download of Animalia records from GGBN in May 2019).…”
Section: Records Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%