2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The global governance of success in HIV/AIDS policy: Emergency action, everyday lives and Sen's capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead it features many aspects of therapeutic domination: the power imbalance inherent in the doctor-patient relationship is evident in the donor-recipient relationship here (McFalls, 2010). This imbalance or lop-sidedness confirms that HIV/AIDS funding in this case fits more closely with humanitarian aid than with post-Washington consensus conditions (McFalls, 2010;Seckinelgin, 2012). In other words, more than 3 decades into the epidemic, HIV/AIDS is still seen as an 'emergency' situation requiring relief aid.…”
Section: Therapeutic Dominationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead it features many aspects of therapeutic domination: the power imbalance inherent in the doctor-patient relationship is evident in the donor-recipient relationship here (McFalls, 2010). This imbalance or lop-sidedness confirms that HIV/AIDS funding in this case fits more closely with humanitarian aid than with post-Washington consensus conditions (McFalls, 2010;Seckinelgin, 2012). In other words, more than 3 decades into the epidemic, HIV/AIDS is still seen as an 'emergency' situation requiring relief aid.…”
Section: Therapeutic Dominationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The international organisations (especially UNAIDS and WHO) legitimise their interventions using the scientific rationality of medicine; the recipients -people affected and infected by HIV -are seen as passively accepting the policy interventions and biomedical interventions dominate and seem unrelated to actual lived experiences and cultural contexts of the recipients (Seckinelgin, 2012). The implication here is that while the language of global HIV/AIDS policy is partnership (ownership, alignment and mutual accountability), the reality is closer to therapeutic domination with donors controlling the nature and extent of interventions.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Iatrogenic Violence In Humanitarian Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is problematic because it is likely that actions that are believed to be best in the short term will exacerbate the problem in the long-term (Barnett and Prins, 2006, p. 360; see also Barnett, 2006). Rather than imposing emergency measures, the response instead should be part of the normal, routine political process (Elbe, 2006, p. 13; see also Seckinelgin, 2012b). An HIV specialist working with CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency) in Malawi explains:…”
Section: Framing the Global Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 It draws upon extensive fieldwork to re-orientate the analysis along the global-local axis by focusing on the micro-level of the politics of health 'from below'. This refocusing is important because viruses spread at the level of the body as a result of interpersonal sexual relations and have ramifications at all levels, from the bodily to the familial, communal, national and the international (see also Anderson, 2012, p. 271;Seckinelgin, 2008Seckinelgin, , 2012bSeckinelgin et al, 2010). In so doing, it connects with work in feminist geopolitics that Koch (2011, p. 500) argues challenges the 'masculinist privileging of the "big things" and the disembodied vision that such an approach generally employs' (see Dowler and Sharp, 2001;Secor, 2001;Sharp, 2000).…”
Section: The Challenges For the Academymentioning
confidence: 99%