2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The global mass functions of 35 Galactic globular clusters: I. Observational data and correlations with cluster parameters

Abstract: We have derived the global mass functions of a sample of 35 Galactic globular clusters by comparing deep Hubble Space Telescope photometry with suitable multimass dynamical models. For a subset of 29 clusters with available radial velocity information we were also able to determine dynamical parameters, mass-to-light ratios and the mass fraction of dark remnants. The derived global mass functions are well described by single power-laws in the mass range 0.2 < m/M ⊙ < 0.8 with mass function slopes α > −1. Less … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also include data from Baumgardt & Hilker (2018) but we limit the sample to bright GCs with M V < −7.5 and those with a mass function slope of α < −0.8. This eliminates clusters that have evolved strongly from the initial Kroupa mass funtion (Sollima & Baumgardt 2017); the remaining sample of dynamically unevolved clusters provides a good match to the high mass, long relaxation time UCDs. Sollima & Baumgardt (2017) found a strong correlation between mass function slope and relaxation time of a cluster.…”
Section: Empirical Ml-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also include data from Baumgardt & Hilker (2018) but we limit the sample to bright GCs with M V < −7.5 and those with a mass function slope of α < −0.8. This eliminates clusters that have evolved strongly from the initial Kroupa mass funtion (Sollima & Baumgardt 2017); the remaining sample of dynamically unevolved clusters provides a good match to the high mass, long relaxation time UCDs. Sollima & Baumgardt (2017) found a strong correlation between mass function slope and relaxation time of a cluster.…”
Section: Empirical Ml-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To convert magnitudes to stellar masses, they adopted the mass-luminosity relation of suitable isochrones from the Dotter et al (2007) database. 47 Tuc was not retained in the final sample analysed in Sollima & Baumgardt (2017), but stellar mass functions determined in the same way as for their 35 selected clusters were provided to us by A. Sollima (priv.…”
Section: Stellar Mass Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, dynamical Monte Carlo of models of 47 Tuc require a flat (low-mass) IMF as initial conditions to reproduce a flat present-day mass function (Giersz & Heggie 2011). Other GCs with similar t rh tend to have steeper low-mass mass functions (corresponding to α 1 indices of ∼ 1, Sollima & Baumgardt 2017, their figure 3), making 47 Tuc a clear outlier. Fig.…”
Section: The Initial Stellar Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present-day mass function slope. There exists a strong correlation between the stellar mass function (MF) of a GC and the amount of mass lost from the cluster as well as their relaxation time (Sollima & Baumgardt 2017, Baumgardt & Hilker 2018. Both, metalrich and metal-poor GGCs, follow the same correlation.…”
Section: Some Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%