The global percutaneous shuttling technique tip for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Abstract

Most arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs utilize suture passing devices placed through arthroscopic cannulas. These devices are limited by the size of the passing device where the suture is passed through the tendon. An alternative technique has been used in the senior author’s practice for the past ten years, where sutures are placed through the rotator cuff tendon using percutaneous passing devices. This technique, dubbed the global percutaneous shuttling technique of rotator cuff repair, affords the placement of sutures from nearly any angle and location in the shoulder, and has the potential advantage of larger suture bites through the tendon edge. These advantages may increase the area of tendon available to compress to the rotator cuff footprint and improve tendon healing and outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe the global percutaneous shuttling (GPS) technique and report our results using this method. The GPS technique can be used for any full thickness rotator cuff tear and is particularly useful for massive cuff tears with poor tissue quality. We recently followed up 22 patients with an average follow up of 32 months to validate its usefulness. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved significantly from 37 preoperatively to 90 postoperatively (P<0.0001). This data supports the use of the GPS technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Further biomechanical studies are currently being performed to assess the improvements in tendon footprint area with this technique.

Schaalia (Formerly Actinomyces) turicensis Infection Following Open Rotator Cuff Repair

“…Deep infections of the shoulder following an open rotator cuff repair (RCR) are relatively uncommon, with reported rates ranging from 0.3-1.9% [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The risk of infections after arthroscopic RCR is considered to be lower than open RCR with reported rates of less than 1% [8][9][10]. However, these studies used retrospective data and may have missed some infections after arthroscopic RCR in patients who sought follow-up care at other institutions [2].…”