2018
DOI: 10.3390/atmos9040138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation

Abstract: Abstract:The new Version 2.3 of the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly analysis is described in terms of changes made to improve the homogeneity of the product, especially after 2002. These changes include corrections to cross-calibration of satellite data inputs and updates to the gauge analysis. Over-ocean changes starting in 2003 resulted in an overall precipitation increase of 1.8% after 2009. Updating the gauge analysis to its final, high-quality version increases the global land tota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
535
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 704 publications
(551 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
535
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Adler et al . () has also used it to compare the most up‐to‐date satellite rainfall products and shows that not all products capture the expected air–sea coupling during ENSO. In situ open‐ocean gauges offer an independent measure of the SST–rainfall relationship across time‐scales for use in validating both model and satellite analyses.…”
Section: Indirect Rainfall Estimation and Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adler et al . () has also used it to compare the most up‐to‐date satellite rainfall products and shows that not all products capture the expected air–sea coupling during ENSO. In situ open‐ocean gauges offer an independent measure of the SST–rainfall relationship across time‐scales for use in validating both model and satellite analyses.…”
Section: Indirect Rainfall Estimation and Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation against the land-only, gauge-based Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) [45,46] (Figures 2 and 3, upper-left panel) also suggest that the Auto-Estimator is well-suited for use as a surrogate of a realistic global precipitation field. Daily comparisons (Figure 3) also show that the Auto-Estimator gives similar rainfall fields to those of other more complex algorithms in terms of detail and structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Daily comparisons (Figure 3) also show that the Auto-Estimator gives similar rainfall fields to those of other more complex algorithms in terms of detail and structure. Validation against the landonly, gauge-based Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) [45,46] (Figures 2 and 3, upperleft panel) also suggest that the Auto-Estimator is well-suited for use as a surrogate of a realistic global precipitation field. Indeed, we are not claiming that the Auto-Estimator is a suitable instantaneous precipitation algorithm for the Iberian Peninsula.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Observational data used for verification include the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) precipitation dataset version 2.3 on a 2.5° × 2.5° grid (Adler et al , ), the ERA‐Interim reanalysis dataset on a 1° × 1° grid (Berrisford et al , ) and the NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) dataset on a 2° × 2° grid (Huang et al , ). For comparison, all the model hindcast and observational data were interpolated into a common 1° × 1° grid with the bilinear interpolation method.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%