The Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost Database: metadata statistics and prospective analysis on future permafrost temperature and active layer depth monitoring site distribution

Abstract

Abstract. The Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P) provides the first dynamic database associated with the Thermal State of Permafrost (TSP) and the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) programs, which extensively collect permafrost temperature and active layer thickness data from Arctic, Antarctic and Mountain permafrost regions. The purpose of the database is to establish an "early warning system" for the consequences of climate change in permafrost regions and to provide standardized thermal permafrost data to global models. In this paper we perform statistical analysis of the GTN-P metadata aiming to identify the spatial gaps in the GTN-P site distribution in relation to climate-effective environmental parameters. We describe the concept and structure of the Data Management System in regard to user operability, data transfer and data policy. We outline data sources and data processing including quality control strategies. Assessment of the metadata and data quality reveals 63% metadata completeness at active layer sites and 50% metadata completeness for boreholes. Voronoi Tessellation Analysis on the spatial sample distribution of boreholes and active layer measurement sites quantifies the distribution inhomogeneity and provides potential locations of additional permafrost research sites to improve the representativeness of thermal monitoring across areas underlain by permafrost. The depth distribution of the boreholes reveals that 73% are shallower than 25 m and 27% are deeper, reaching a maximum of 1 km depth. Comparison of the GTN-P site distribution with permafrost zones, soil organic carbon contents and vegetation types exhibits different local to regional monitoring situations on maps. Preferential slope orientation at the sites most likely causes a bias in the temperature monitoring and should be taken into account when using the data for global models. The distribution of GTN-P sites within zones of projected temperature change show a high representation of areas with smaller expected temperature rise but a lower number of sites within arctic areas were climate models project extreme temperature increase. This paper offers a scientific basis for planning future permafrost research sites on large scales.

Response of plant communities to climate change during the late Holocene: Palaeoecological insights from peatlands in the Alaskan Arctic

“…Peatlands in the Arctic are important archives of palaeoenvironmental data owing to their sensitivity to climatic and hydrological change (Turetsky et al, 2002;Lamarre et al, 2012). Rising temperatures have driven partial or complete thawing of permafrost peatlands in many arctic regions (Biskaborn et al, 2015). Northern Alaska has experienced rapid climate warming during the twentieth century, degradation of permafrost peatlands and deepening of the active layer (Raynolds et al, 2014).…”

Automatic three-dimensional sorting system based on internet and database

“…The designed automatic three-dimensional sorting system based on internet and database is compared with three-dimensional sorting system based on distance optimisation for overall system performance. MATLAB 7.2 simulation software (Biskaborn et al, 2015) on the same computer is used to carry out sorting data. The number of solutions is 100 times, and the average of 100 solutions is taken as the basis for the comparative analysis of system overall performance.…”

Studying permafrost by integrating satellite and in situ data in the northern high-latitude regions

“…The active layer is the surface layer of soil that is seasonally frozen in winter and thaw each summer, causing relatively large surface movements at the order of centimetres, or even decimetres over periods of months (seasonal variations) and years (cf. Biskaborn et al 2015). The talik is an unfrozen ground layer that lies below the active layer and above the permafrost.…”