2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
151
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
151
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common metric is the global warming potential (GWP(τ )), which takes the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing of pulse non-CO 2 and CO 2 emissions over a fixed time horizon (τ ), typically 100 years. The GWP(100) was initially intended as a placeholder [10], in large part because of its sensitivity to the arbitrarily selected time horizon [7] (Fig. 1c,d), but it remains the standard metric for technology evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common metric is the global warming potential (GWP(τ )), which takes the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing of pulse non-CO 2 and CO 2 emissions over a fixed time horizon (τ ), typically 100 years. The GWP(100) was initially intended as a placeholder [10], in large part because of its sensitivity to the arbitrarily selected time horizon [7] (Fig. 1c,d), but it remains the standard metric for technology evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the emissions of NOx and the SOx now to be reduced actually mitigate global warming (Lauer et al, 2007;Eyring et al, 2010), whereas emissions of black carbon (BC) and methane (CH4) -remaining unrestricted -contribute to global warming (Jacobson, 2010;Bond et al, 2013;Myhre and Shindell, 2013;Fuglestvedt et al, 2014;Lindstad and Sandaas, 2016). Metrics that weight emitted gases according to their global warming potential (GWP), to report them in terms of "CO2 equivalents", have become standard currency to benchmark and communicate the relative and absolute contributions to climate change (Shine, 2009). GWP gives negative weights for emitted exhaust gases and particles that have a cooling effect, and positive weights for those that have a warming effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of the GWP, with the lack of robustness of other metrics, has led to its adoption as the metric for CO 2 -equivalence in the Kyoto protocol, with the consequence of casting the concept in stone (Shine, 2009). Earlier alternative metrics such as those of Hammitt et al (1996) and Kandlikar (1996) have somewhat become forgotten, while there is still active literature on GWP (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%