2015
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02296-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Glycosylation Status of PrP C Is a Key Factor in Determining Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Transmission between Species

Abstract: The risk of transmission of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) between different species has been notoriously unpredictable because the mechanisms of transmission are not fully understood. A transmission barrier between species often prevents infection of a new host with a TSE agent. Nonetheless, some TSE agents are able to cross this barrier and infect new species, with devastating consequences. The host PrPC misfolds during disease pathogenesis and has a major role in controlling the transmissio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that in sFI (but not in sCJDMM2) the glycoform ratio of totPrP Sc is dominated by the di-glycosylated form and differs from that of resPrP Sc argues that, in sFI, senPrP Sc and resPrP Sc preferentially target different PrP C glycoforms for conversion2122232425. It has recently been proposed that the sialic acid moiety of the PrP C glycans impairs conversion to PrP Sc  24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that in sFI (but not in sCJDMM2) the glycoform ratio of totPrP Sc is dominated by the di-glycosylated form and differs from that of resPrP Sc argues that, in sFI, senPrP Sc and resPrP Sc preferentially target different PrP C glycoforms for conversion2122232425. It has recently been proposed that the sialic acid moiety of the PrP C glycans impairs conversion to PrP Sc  24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, PrP C conversion to senPrP Sc might be less affected by sugar sialylation in sFI, or senPrP Sc and resPrP Sc glycoforms might have different turnovers. Regardless of the mechanism, the difference in glycoform ratios is significant considering the rising evidence that glycan representation, structure or both can affect strain characteristics212526.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, glycosylation can affect efficiency of neuroinvasion after peripheral infection (33). Glycosylation was also found to influence cross-species interactions between PrPsen and PrPres during in vitro conversion reactions (34) as well as cross-species infection in vivo (35). The mechanisms of these effects are not clear, but glycosylation differences might act by altering protein folding or interactions of PrPres which might, in turn, influence further cycles of new PrPres generation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of mature, complex N-linked sugars on PrP C is one indicator of proper folding and transport to the cell surface (52,56,67) and can influence conversion and TSE pathogenesis (68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74). In order to establish if WT and TM PrP were glycosylated similarly, lysates were treated with PNGase F, which cleaves N-linked oligosaccharides from glycoproteins (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%