2021
DOI: 10.3390/jof7020082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Glyoxysomal Protease LON2 Is Involved in Fruiting-Body Development, Ascosporogenesis and Stress Resistance in Sordaria macrospora

Abstract: Microbodies, including peroxisomes, glyoxysomes and Woronin bodies, are ubiquitous dynamic organelles that play important roles in fungal development. The ATP-dependent chaperone and protease family Lon that maintain protein quality control within the organelle significantly regulate the functionality of microbodies. The filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora is a model organism for studying fruiting-body development. The genome of S. macrospora encodes one Lon protease with the C-terminal peroxisomal targ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both fusion constructs (POM33-EGFP and POM33-TagRFP-T) displayed a donut-like localization presumably around the nucleus that differs from the localization of free EGFP or TagRFP-T ( Figure 2 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials ). For localization of free EGFP or TagRFP-T, S. macrospora wt was transformed with plasmid p1783-1 [ 62 ] or pTagRFP-T_nat [ 44 ], respectively. To verify the localization of POM33 around the nucleus, we crossed the wildtype (wt) strain expressing POM33-EGFP with a fus1-1 (fus) strain expressing the histone 2B (H2B) fused to tdTomato ( Figure 2 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both fusion constructs (POM33-EGFP and POM33-TagRFP-T) displayed a donut-like localization presumably around the nucleus that differs from the localization of free EGFP or TagRFP-T ( Figure 2 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials ). For localization of free EGFP or TagRFP-T, S. macrospora wt was transformed with plasmid p1783-1 [ 62 ] or pTagRFP-T_nat [ 44 ], respectively. To verify the localization of POM33 around the nucleus, we crossed the wildtype (wt) strain expressing POM33-EGFP with a fus1-1 (fus) strain expressing the histone 2B (H2B) fused to tdTomato ( Figure 2 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting fragment was integrated into Bgl II-digested p5′sci1gfp_nat via HR in S. cerevisiae . For plasmids p5′pom33-TagRFP-T_hyg/_nat, a fragment comprised of the pom33 promoter and pom33 ORF was amplified with primer pair Smpom33-f/Smpom33-RFP-r from wt gDNA and a fragment comprised of TagRFP-T and the TtrpC terminator of A. nidulans was amplified with primer pair RFP-f/pRS426GFPrev from pTagRFP-T_nat [ 44 ]. Both fragments were integrated into Xho I-linearized pRS-nat [ 46 ] or pRS-hyg [ 6 ] via HR in S. cerevisiae .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct the pSmarp1-TagRFP-T_nat/_hyg plasmids, the Smarp1 promoter and coding sequence was amplified with the Arp1_5′f/Arp1_RFP_r primer pair from S. macrospora wt gDNA. The TagRFP-T sequence and the A. nidulans TtrpC were amplified using the primer pairs of RFP-f/RFP-r-trpC from pTagRFP-T_nat [ 61 ] and TrpC_F/pRS426GFPrev from p1783-1 [ 60 ], respectively. The S. cerevisiae strain PJ69-4A was transformed with the three amplicons and Xho I-linearized pRS-hyg [ 62 ] or pRS-nat [ 58 ] to generate recombinant plasmids via homologous recombination [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crosses were performed as described previously [51]. wt::TagRFP-T ectopic integration of ptRFP_nat into DSM997; nat R , ssi, Pccg1::TagRFP-T::TtrpC [61] wt::GG-C-F-mNG ectopic integration of pGG-C-F-mNG in DSM997; nat R , ssi, Pgpd::mNG::3xFLAG::TtrpC…”
Section: Generation Of the Smarp1 Deletion Strain ∆Smarp1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, elimination of Atg24 –a sorting nexin involved in pexophagy, mitophagy and non-selective autophagy–reduces the lifespan of this fungus ( Henkel et al, 2020 ). Furthermore, in the mycelial ascomycete Sordaria macrospora , loss of the pexophagy receptor NBR1 ( Werner et al, 2019 ), or of the peroxisomal protease LON2 ( Werner et al, 2021 ), decreases ascospore formation, suggesting parallel systems for peroxisome quality control during ascospore formation. Still, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , peroxisomes are segregated meiotically, but changes in their intracellular dynamics, at least concerning their abundance, are less apparent ( Gurvitz et al, 1998 ), suggesting different requirements for peroxisome dynamics in distinct meiotic developmental processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%