“…Some evidence supports the use of a thigh and/or ankle pressure of 50-70mmHg as a criterion for successful healing after major amputation (Barnes et al., 1976;Dean et al, 1975;Evans et al, 1990;Holstein, 1973;McCollum and Walker, 1992;Pollock et al, 1980;Schwartz et al, 1982), although calcified non-compressible arteries, often found in diabetic patients, give falsely elevated values for thigh and ankle pressures (Gibbons et al, 1979;Raines et al, 1976). Various other tests, such as segmental systolic pressure (Baker et al, 1977;Dean et al, 1975), skin perfusion pressure and/or blood flow (Adera et al, 1995;Dwars et al, 1992;Holloway and Burgess, 1983;Holstein et al, 1979;Karanfilian et al, 1986;Lantsberg and Goldman, 1991;Malone et al, 1981) and TcPo2 (Burgess et al, 1982;Padberg et al, 1996;Wutschert and Bounameaux, 1997;Weiss et al, 1988) have been described as predictors of healing after amputation. Most of these techniques are expensive and difficult to perform correctly, and none has gained wide Factors afecting wound healing 20 1 acceptance Sarin et al, 1991;Wagner et al, 1988).…”