1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(81)90089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “gold standard” for amputation level selection: Xenon-133 clearance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some evidence supports the use of a thigh and/or ankle pressure of 50-70mmHg as a criterion for successful healing after major amputation (Barnes et al., 1976;Dean et al, 1975;Evans et al, 1990;Holstein, 1973;McCollum and Walker, 1992;Pollock et al, 1980;Schwartz et al, 1982), although calcified non-compressible arteries, often found in diabetic patients, give falsely elevated values for thigh and ankle pressures (Gibbons et al, 1979;Raines et al, 1976). Various other tests, such as segmental systolic pressure (Baker et al, 1977;Dean et al, 1975), skin perfusion pressure and/or blood flow (Adera et al, 1995;Dwars et al, 1992;Holloway and Burgess, 1983;Holstein et al, 1979;Karanfilian et al, 1986;Lantsberg and Goldman, 1991;Malone et al, 1981) and TcPo2 (Burgess et al, 1982;Padberg et al, 1996;Wutschert and Bounameaux, 1997;Weiss et al, 1988) have been described as predictors of healing after amputation. Most of these techniques are expensive and difficult to perform correctly, and none has gained wide Factors afecting wound healing 20 1 acceptance Sarin et al, 1991;Wagner et al, 1988).…”
Section: Level Of Amputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some evidence supports the use of a thigh and/or ankle pressure of 50-70mmHg as a criterion for successful healing after major amputation (Barnes et al., 1976;Dean et al, 1975;Evans et al, 1990;Holstein, 1973;McCollum and Walker, 1992;Pollock et al, 1980;Schwartz et al, 1982), although calcified non-compressible arteries, often found in diabetic patients, give falsely elevated values for thigh and ankle pressures (Gibbons et al, 1979;Raines et al, 1976). Various other tests, such as segmental systolic pressure (Baker et al, 1977;Dean et al, 1975), skin perfusion pressure and/or blood flow (Adera et al, 1995;Dwars et al, 1992;Holloway and Burgess, 1983;Holstein et al, 1979;Karanfilian et al, 1986;Lantsberg and Goldman, 1991;Malone et al, 1981) and TcPo2 (Burgess et al, 1982;Padberg et al, 1996;Wutschert and Bounameaux, 1997;Weiss et al, 1988) have been described as predictors of healing after amputation. Most of these techniques are expensive and difficult to perform correctly, and none has gained wide Factors afecting wound healing 20 1 acceptance Sarin et al, 1991;Wagner et al, 1988).…”
Section: Level Of Amputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin blood flow and skin perfusion pressure using various nuclear medicine imaging techniques have been reported to provide valuable data for tissue ischemia [9][10][11][12]. However, these methods do not reflect perfusion to deeper tissues and do not indicate the extent or distribution of muscle damage [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pain scores (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) are shown at Fig 9. At 2 months, pain scores were (0, 0, and 1). Improvement continued post-pump with demarcation of gangrene, improvement of claudication, and improvement of ischemic neuropathy.…”
Section: Human Hyperperfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%