In 1931 (1, 2), publication was first made from our laboratory of a prolonged series of experiments which disclosed a singular ineffectiveness of prolan 1 when administered to hypophysectomized animals. ~ In seeking an explanation of these facts it seemed likely that the effect of prolan on normal young animals must therefore be strengthened by some element furnished by the animal's own hypophysis. An endeavor was hence made to increase the prolan effect in normal young animals by combining prolan with hypophyseal extracts. A clear-cut synergism was demonstrated by combining the two substances (3, 4). The first results were secured by combining with hypophyseal extracts containing the growth hormone, and from preliminary considerations it seemed probable that the growth hormone in the growthpromoting extracts was responsible for the new phenomenon. The * Aided by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and from the Committee for Research in Problems of Sex of the National Research Council. We desire here also to express our thanks to the I. G. of Elberfeld, Germany, who, through Drs. Ht~rlein, W. Schulemann and F. Laqueur, placed generous amounts of prolan at our disposal, and finally, to Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, without whose assistance in securing hypophyseal products this research would have been impossible.For the sake of convenience, we have employed this term (after Zondek) to designate the substance in the urine of pregnant women which precociously stimulates ovarian development in immature rats or mice.~' So impressive indeed was this experience that it at first indicated the total incapacity of proian, regardless of dose, to effect the sexual system of hypophysectomized animals, although later work showed that this result could be obtained with extremely high dosage (2, 5).