1971
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(71)90055-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The good behavior clock: A reinforcement/time out procedure for reducing disruptive classroom behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent observers used a modified version of a time-sampling technique described by Kubany, Weiss, and Sloggett (1971) to record student and teacher behaviors. Each student was observed for a 1 5-min observation period, during which time the observer glanced over at the student every 15 sec and scored his behavior at that instant as either appropriate, passive, or disruptive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent observers used a modified version of a time-sampling technique described by Kubany, Weiss, and Sloggett (1971) to record student and teacher behaviors. Each student was observed for a 1 5-min observation period, during which time the observer glanced over at the student every 15 sec and scored his behavior at that instant as either appropriate, passive, or disruptive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of peer groups has aided in modifying the behavior of a hyperactive child (Patterson, 1965;Patterson, Jones, Whittier, and Wright, 1965), in increasing the popularity of children (Alden, Pettigrew, and Skiba, 1970), in modifying off-task behavior (Ascare and Axelrod, 1973;Coleman, 1970;Feldman, 1973;Greenberg and O'Donnell, 1972;Kubany, Weiss, and Sloggett, 1971;Wolf, Hanley, King, Lachowicz, and Giles, 1970), in accelerating academic progress (Cocalis, 1972;Evans and Oswalt, 1967), and in maintaining appropriate social and academic behavior (Walker and Buckley, 1972) The independent group-oriented contingency system has been extensively applied in special-education classrooms and less extensively in regular public school classrooms, using at least three types of reinforcement procedures. For example, based on Premack's principle of reinforcement, the arrangement of free-time or special activities contingent upon the individual behaviors of all students in a classroom has been reported to increase desirable classroom behavior (Homme, deBaca, Devine, Steinhorst, and Rickert, 1963;Osborne, 1969;Wasik, 1970) and to improve academic performance (Hopkins, Schutte, and Garton, 1971;Lovitt, Guppy, and Blattner, 1969).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second subcategory of nonexclusion time-out, removal of stimulus conditions, imposes the contingent removal of reinforcing stimuli such as work or play materials (Haring & Kennedy, 1990), food (Barton et al, 1970;Watson & Scott, 1994), or opportunity to gain tokens (Kubany et al, 1971) for a certain amount of time after target behaviors are displayed. The reintroduction of reinforcing stimuli should be contingent upon demonstrating appropriate behavior to avoid inadvertently reinforcing inappropriate behavior.…”
Section: Types Of Time-outmentioning
confidence: 99%