1993
DOI: 10.1300/j019v14n03_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Good Behavior Game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group contingencies have been shown to decrease disruptive behavior and increase compliant behavior in students of all ages (Maggin, Johnson, Chafouleas, Ruberto, & Berggren, 2012; Poduska et al, 2007; Stage & Quiroz, 1997; Swiezy, Matson, & Box, 1992). Applying group contingencies appears to help students become more aware of their own behavior, particularly its effect on others, thus supporting development of social skills (Poduska et al, 2007).…”
Section: Group Contingenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group contingencies have been shown to decrease disruptive behavior and increase compliant behavior in students of all ages (Maggin, Johnson, Chafouleas, Ruberto, & Berggren, 2012; Poduska et al, 2007; Stage & Quiroz, 1997; Swiezy, Matson, & Box, 1992). Applying group contingencies appears to help students become more aware of their own behavior, particularly its effect on others, thus supporting development of social skills (Poduska et al, 2007).…”
Section: Group Contingenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation is that few studies have been conducted with young children in classroom environments, particularly preschool-age children. One exception is an evaluation of a modified version of the GBG conducted by Swiezy, Matson, and Box (1992), in which the experimenters showed that the GBG was effective for increasing compliance and cooperation for four preschool children (i.e., two dyads of preschool children) during free-play periods. However, there were several major differences between the original GBG procedure and the GBG procedure used by Swiezy et al For example, points were delivered for cooperation between the dyad on completing a mutual task (e.g., putting books away).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the GBG literature is that previous research has primarily included data collection and analysis of group data (e.g., mean levels of behavior of a group of children or entire class of children). Although a few studies have included data collection and analysis of individual participant data (McGoey, Schneider, Rezzetano, Prodan, & Tankersley, 2010;Medland & Stachnik, 1972;Pennington & McComas, 2017;Swiezy et al, 1992;Tanol, Johnson, McComas, & Cote, 2010), most either do not report those data or only report the data for the most disruptive children. One exception is a recent study by Groves and Austin (2017) in which the experimenters compared two versions of the GBG in a classroom for students with severe emotional and behavioral disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organising games are common practices of this subject. Through games, children are expected to learn and grow complying with rules while, at the same time, improving their intellectual, emotional and social interaction domains (Swiezy, Matson and Box, 1993;Hsu, Liang, Chai, and Tsai, 2013). Irrespective to their peers" achievements, teachers always try to make children aware of their individual progress in the activities, hence they gain confidence and eliminate sense of failure and rejection.…”
Section: Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%