2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-012-0736-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The good character at work: an initial study on the contribution of character strengths in identifying healthy and unhealthy work-related behavior and experience patterns

Abstract: The study underlines the relevance of character strengths in work settings and suggests that interventions based on character strengths could substantiate interventions already existing at the workplace in order to enhance positive work outcomes further (e.g., work satisfaction, engagement).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is psychometrically well established and employed in various fields such as education (Shoshani & Aviv, 2012), work (Gander, Proyer, Ruch, & Wyss, 2012), health (Proctor, Maltby, & Linley, 2011), and illness (Peterson, Park, & Seligman, 2006), and employed with adolescents and adults Weber & Rusch, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is psychometrically well established and employed in various fields such as education (Shoshani & Aviv, 2012), work (Gander, Proyer, Ruch, & Wyss, 2012), health (Proctor, Maltby, & Linley, 2011), and illness (Peterson, Park, & Seligman, 2006), and employed with adolescents and adults Weber & Rusch, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is primarily characterized by a low sense of subjective importance of work, of professional ambition and readiness to spend energy, as well as lowered level of perfection at work. Both individuals functioning within type G -Healthy and within type S -Savings display a positive, healthy attitude towards work and more frequently possess "strong personality traits," according to the classification constructed by Peterson and Seligman [28,29]. Individuals functioning within type S -Savings more frequently cope with work-related problems by using the strategy of avoidance and resignation [19].…”
Section: Type S -Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, different character strengths were meaningfully associated with different work-related behavior. For example, perseverance, zest, and love of learning showed the numerically strongest relationships with career ambition, and employees with higher scores in the character strengths (e.g., hope, zest, bravery, and perspective) tended to have healthier work behavior (Gander et al, 2012). Harzer and Ruch (2014) reported various, replicable associations between character strengths and self- and supervisory ratings of different dimensions of job performance (i.e., task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, as well as organizational support).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%