2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2008.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The good, the bad, and the great: Homomorphisms and cores of random graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prove the main result of this paper-Theorem 3.1-we need several lemmas, collected together in the following result. This extends Lemma 1 in [3] to random digraphs.…”
Section: Asymptotic Properties Of Random Digraphssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In order to prove the main result of this paper-Theorem 3.1-we need several lemmas, collected together in the following result. This extends Lemma 1 in [3] to random digraphs.…”
Section: Asymptotic Properties Of Random Digraphssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The EXACT-WEIGHT-H problem asks, given an edge-weighted graph G, whether there exists a subgraph of G that has weight zero and is isomorphic to H. We say H is a core if every homomorphism from H to H is also an automorphism. Cores are a rich class of graphs, including cliques, odd cycles, and (with high probability) any binomial random graph G(n, p) with edge probability n −1/3 log 2 n < p < 1 − n 1/3 log 2 n (see [10,Theorem 2]). Corollary 6 generalises to EXACT-WEIGHT-H whenever H is a core.…”
Section: Exact-weight K-clique and Other Subgraph Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the correctness of Coarse (Lemma 18) and a union bound over all 1 ≤ i ≤ |L| and all j ∈ [t i ], we have P(E 2 ) ≥ 1 − δ/2. By a union bound with (10), we therefore have…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%