2011
DOI: 10.1525/9780520948693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Googlization of Everything

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…What began as a project to index and inter-reference websites, structuring the internet as ‘searchable’, expanded to the offline world of places and ideas through projects like Google Maps and Google Books. Google has become, in practice, a general interface to or index of almost anything – a phenomenon that a popular book called ‘the Googlization of everything’ (Vaidhyanathan, 2011). 3 With the aspiration to index everything worth searching for, Google has helped create conditions in which the logic of its data structures often determines how everything indexed seems to stand together as if inherently interrelated, by the very conditions of being indexible.…”
Section: Within Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What began as a project to index and inter-reference websites, structuring the internet as ‘searchable’, expanded to the offline world of places and ideas through projects like Google Maps and Google Books. Google has become, in practice, a general interface to or index of almost anything – a phenomenon that a popular book called ‘the Googlization of everything’ (Vaidhyanathan, 2011). 3 With the aspiration to index everything worth searching for, Google has helped create conditions in which the logic of its data structures often determines how everything indexed seems to stand together as if inherently interrelated, by the very conditions of being indexible.…”
Section: Within Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the path opened by Barbrook, an influential group of critics has responded to the utopian narratives of digital gift exchange by stressing the commodification of online cultural production (Terranova, 2000), user activity (Andrejevic, 2002), web design (Coyne, 2005), open-source software (Fuchs, 2009), search (Vaidhyanathan, 2012), and user data (Gerlitz and Helmond, 2013) as an integral and exploitative feature of the Internet economy. Writing from an autonomist perspective, Terranova (2000) analyzes "the digital economy as a specific mechanism of internal 'capture' of larger pools of social and cultural knowledge" (p. 38):…”
Section: The Critique Of Digital Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing narrative today routinely frames the provision of "free" information online as a lure impelling users to participate in the uncompensated production of data commodities. One no longer seems to need a theoretically nuanced Marxian critique in the style of Terranova (2000), Andrejevic (2002), Dean (2005), or Fuchs (2009) to grasp the role "gifts" play in digital capitalism; journalists and public intellectuals such as Angwin (2014), Bogost (2017), Levy (2009), Madrigal (2017), Morozov (2015), Vaidhyanathan (2012), (Wu, 2016), and numerous others have explained it so much that even television news anchors now understand it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search engines increasingly define users’ experiences of the internet, a common one-stop shop for finding information, entertainment, or other content. As John Battelle has argued, “search has become a universally understood method of navigating our information universe” (2005, 4) and it appears that Google in particular has come to dominate many Americans’ use of the web (Vaidhyanathan 2011). Increasingly, that which can be found via web search has come to stand in for that which is available, as search engines operate as a default portal through which we seek answers, access known content, and encounter the unexpected.…”
Section: The Search For Captioning’s Futurementioning
confidence: 99%