2018
DOI: 10.1080/13636820.2018.1498906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The governance of decentralised cooperation in collective training systems: a review and conceptualisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
69
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that Switzerland is considered to be the most liberal collective skill formation system (Emmenegger et al 2019), both the state's capacity and the influence of the unions proved stronger than expected. Under pressure to bring more young people into dual vocational training, the state initiated the introduction of short-tracks and a corresponding collective governance infrastructure, although both unions and employers initially opposed a lower level within VET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that Switzerland is considered to be the most liberal collective skill formation system (Emmenegger et al 2019), both the state's capacity and the influence of the unions proved stronger than expected. Under pressure to bring more young people into dual vocational training, the state initiated the introduction of short-tracks and a corresponding collective governance infrastructure, although both unions and employers initially opposed a lower level within VET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to understand different trajectories of liberalization, studying collective skill formation systems, which are located at the intersection of education and labour market policies, can generate insightful answers. Collective skill formation systems build on the cooperation among state actors, employers, and unions for the purpose of providing vocational education and training (VET) for a broad share of the population (Culpepper and Finegold 1999;Busemeyer and Trampusch 2012;Emmenegger et al 2019). However, pressures on firms to cost-minimize along with global competition and swift changes in skill demands in the post-industrial era may reduce the number of apprenticeship positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than a system offering benefits for both students and a wider labour market, which is common, for instance, in those VET systems characterised as collective skills regimes (e.g. Busemeyer and Trampusch 2011;Dobbins and Busemeyer 2015;Emmenegger, Graf, and Trampusch 2019;Thelen 2004), the underpinning principles of this device focus on the benefits for employers. The concerns raised by Australian industry about losing influence over VET in a marketised system are extraneous in the Swedish case, as both public and private education providers are dependent on employers in the tendering-like process of applications for approval and funding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two latter aspects, relating to the role of unions, can be expected in a statist type of system (where the role of social partners in VET is limited) to be less relevant at the local level. However, at the local level, it can be assumed that the characteristics and degree of firm coordination are essential for firm strategies (Emmenegger, Graf, and Trampusch 2019). Building on Busemeyer and Trampusch's model (see above), Remington argues that it is useful to study local partnerships in VET along two dimensions: 'breadth or scope of participation, and depth of commitment on the part of the organisational partners' (Remington 2018, 506).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%