2003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203402603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Government and Politics of France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For a better understanding of the French local institutions, politics and planning system, readers may refer to: Knapp and Wright 2006, Booth et al 2007, Booth 2009). 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a better understanding of the French local institutions, politics and planning system, readers may refer to: Knapp and Wright 2006, Booth et al 2007, Booth 2009). 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this reasoning, Taggart (2006) stresses the importance of regarding referendums as a constitutive ingredient in the politics of European integration, and van der Eijk and Franklin (2004) demonstrate how the European and domestic dimensions are progressively merging. With respect to this, some studies suggest that the European cleavage is not a strong factor structuring party competition (Harmsen, 2004;Knapp & Wright, 2006), whereas other visions focus on how attitudes towards Europe might become a potential cleavage and structure party systems (van der Eijk & Franklin, 2004).…”
Section: The Theoretical Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental movement is classified by classic (neo-) pluralist and (neo-) corporatist accounts of French politics as an inert, dwindling and excluded set of actors (Wilson, 1987;Elgie and Griggs, 2000;Knapp and Wright, 2006). A group-centric perspective reveals a multiplicity of actor capability.…”
Section: Darren Mccauley Environmental Mobilization and Resource-oppomentioning
confidence: 99%