2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4975410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The graded product of real spectral triples

Abstract: Forming the product of two geometric spaces is one of the most basic operations in geometry, but in the spectral-triple formulation of non-commutative geometry, the standard prescription for taking the product of two real spectral triples is problematic: among other drawbacks, it is non-commutative, non-associative, does not transform properly under unitaries, and often fails to define a proper spectral triple. In this paper, we explain that these various problems result from using the ungraded tensor product;… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was completed in [8], where the odd-odd case was considered as well (in [24] one of the spectral triples is always assumed to be even), along with several possible choices of Dirac operators and real structures. The modified definition of J , which perhaps seems somewhat artificial, was reinterpreted in [14] as a graded tensor product.…”
Section: Products and The Second-order Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was completed in [8], where the odd-odd case was considered as well (in [24] one of the spectral triples is always assumed to be even), along with several possible choices of Dirac operators and real structures. The modified definition of J , which perhaps seems somewhat artificial, was reinterpreted in [14] as a graded tensor product.…”
Section: Products and The Second-order Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we follow this idea in spirit, but we will find that the "correct" definition of J is not the one in [8,14,24]. Our motivation is that we want the second-order property (5) to be preserved by products, and this will lead to yet another different definition of J .…”
Section: Products and The Second-order Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work, we will discuss the implications of this formalism for taking tensor products of spectral triples, since this is an interesting story in its own right [48].…”
Section: Jhep06(2018)071mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extension of this tensor product to odddimensional indefinite spectral triples seems difficult, if one considers the complexity of the Riemannian case [69][70][71][72][73]. Note that Farnsworth also advocates the use of a graded tensor product [73].…”
Section: Indefinite Spectral Triplementioning
confidence: 99%