1994
DOI: 10.2307/1163222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The "Grammar" of Schooling: Why Has It Been So Hard to Change?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
259
0
22

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
259
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality of how technology is used in actual learning environments is often both more prosaic and less transformative (see for example Becker, Ravitz & Wong, 2009;Cuban, Kirkpatrick, & Peck 2006). The fact that past efforts to transform education with technology have had little effect (e.g., Tyack & Tobin, 1994) is a central feature of the "skeptics''' argument. Opponents, on the other hand, take the skeptics' argument one step further by pointing out that resources expended on modern digital technologies are better spent on analog equivalents.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality of how technology is used in actual learning environments is often both more prosaic and less transformative (see for example Becker, Ravitz & Wong, 2009;Cuban, Kirkpatrick, & Peck 2006). The fact that past efforts to transform education with technology have had little effect (e.g., Tyack & Tobin, 1994) is a central feature of the "skeptics''' argument. Opponents, on the other hand, take the skeptics' argument one step further by pointing out that resources expended on modern digital technologies are better spent on analog equivalents.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not deep structure affects schools and classrooms in a positive or negative way, it may be valued by society because most people have not experienced alternative approaches to instruction in schools that result in enhanced development in students" communicative competence. A common script, the apprenticeship of observation, and the grammar of schooling have been discussed in the past by scholars as impediments to school reform (Lortie, 1975(Lortie, , 2002Metz, 1990;Tyack & Tobin, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to Tye, several other scholars suggest a myriad of theories and explanations as to why teachers teach the way they do, and why successful educational reform is difficult to attain (Berlak and Berlak, 1981;Goodlad, 1974Goodlad, , 2004Lortie, 1975Lortie, , 2002Metz, 1990;Tyack & Tobin, 1994). Tyack and Tobin (1994) relate well to the concept of deep structure in their identification of the "grammar" of schooling, adding further to the linguistic lexicon being used to define failed school reform (p. 454). They point out that certain structures and rules that organize instructional work in schools have remained stable for decades.…”
Section: Operationalizing Deep Structure Journal Of Language Teamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es decir, sometida a la presión del proceso educativo y de la denominada "gramática de la escuela" (Tyack, y Tobin, 1994), olvidando aquellos elementos positivos, como el enraizamiento con el entorno o la cercanía al aprendizaje mediante el diálogo compartido: docentes que enseñan, comunidad que participa activamente y estudiantes que aprenden. De una escuela basada en elementos locales se transita a una escuela descontextualizada (conocimiento) y deslocalizada (entorno).…”
Section: La Nueva Ruralidadunclassified