The Grammarian's Choice: the Popularity of Euripides' Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman Education

Cribiore, R.

doi:10.32880/2587-7127-2018-2-2-231-250

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While this is generally not believed any more, the school system is still regarded as the most important factor in the selection of the canonical plays: e.g. Marrou 1964, 245;Cribiore 2001;Canfora 2002, 31-32 andGarland 2005, 69-70. 38 Finglass 2020.…”

Section: André Lardinoismentioning

confidence: 99%

Canonisation as Innovation

Agut‐Labordère¹,

Versluys²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prefaceand the development of a cosmopolitan world that stretched from the Atlantic to the Oxus, one of the hallmarks defining the first millennium BCe, necessitated canonisation as cultural formation more than ever before. It is interesting to compare this to Globalisation processes in our own era. The eight specifically commissioned case studies, ranging widely but all consistently focussing on canonisation as a form of anchoring cultural formation, illustrate this in a variety of ways. They converge in a concluding essay that brings the individual case studies together and critically evaluates the aims of the volume as a whole, especially also with regard to the notion of increasing connectivity. Note that we have not standardised the spelling of canonisation versus canonization throughout the volume.The first expert meeting on which this book is based was held at the University of Nanterre on 21 September, 2018; we would like to thank ARSCAM (UMR 7041) for its (financial) support. The second expert meeting was held at

show abstract

Section: André Lardinoismentioning

confidence: 99%

Canonisation as Innovation

Agut‐Labordère¹,

Versluys²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The name 'the Selection' nevertheless remains a convenient shorthand, as long as we remember that any process of selection was more akin to Natural Selection than to any discrete moment of choice.55. SeeCribiore (2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Brill's Companion to Euripides (2 vols)

Finglass¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

piece inevitably overlaps with Finglass (2012), which is concerned with the transmission of Sophocles; in this study, however, I have spent more time on the ancient transmission, since the evidence is more abundant than in the case of Sophocles. Even so, much relevant material has been omitted -for example, an account of the use of Euripides made by other ancient writers and the implications that this has for familiarity with Euripides' works. For excellent accounts of the transmission of Euripides, which more than complement my own piece, see Barrett (1964) 45-84 andParker (2007) lvii-lxvii. An important analysis of the transmission of tragedy in general can be found in Garland (2004). 4 Eur. test. 1.IB.5, 3.5 TrGF.

show abstract

“…Conforme a praxe do De acordo com Hägg (2010, p. 115-8), a qualidade e o sucesso dos dramas foram as principais influências do processo de conservação dos textos, mas não há provas diretas dessa e de outras especulações. Evidências mais claras dos elementos determinantes da sobrevivência de obras completas dos três poetas do cânone datam da época imperial, 10 quando se formaram as coletâneas e os antigos rolos de papiro começaram a ser copiados para os códices (EASTERLING, 1997, p. 224-7;CRIBIORE, 2001;WEBB, 2008, p. 63;MASTRONARDE, 2017, p. 14-6) . Algumas tragédias de Eurípides chegaram até nossos 11 dias a partir de antiga e rara edição completa de seus dramas , à margem dessa tendência de 12 formação de seleções, mas ignoramos por que certos dramas desapareceram completamente entre a primeira apresentação e a preparação das edições alexandrinas (JOUAN e VAN LOOY 2002, v. 1, p. xi-xv), e outros sobreviveram através de títulos, hipóteses parciais, versos truncados e citações .…”

unclassified

A recepção das tragédias fragmentárias de Eurípides nos séculos V e IV a.C.

Ribeiro

2018

CODEX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo apresenta um panorama da recepção das tragédias fragmentárias de Eurípides durante os séculos V e IV a.C. e de sua contribuição para nossos conhecimentos sobre os enredos. Aspectos selecionados das performances, reapresentações e influências das tragédias Andrômeda, Cresfonte, Éolo, Erecteu, Hipsípile,Télefoe Teseuem poetas trágicos, poetas cômicos, decoradores de vasos e comentadores antigos são brevemente discutidos.

show abstract

The Grammarian's Choice: the Popularity of Euripides' Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman Education

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Canonisation as Innovation

Canonisation as Innovation

Brill's Companion to Euripides (2 vols)

A recepção das tragédias fragmentárias de Eurípides nos séculos V e IV a.C.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About