The Great Recession and the Allure of New Immigrant Destinations in the United States

Abstract

In the 1990s, the immigrant population in the United States dispersed to non-traditional settlement locations (what have become known as “new immigrant destinations”). This paper examines whether the allure of new destinations persisted in the 2000s with a particular focus on the internal migration of the foreign born during the recent deep recessionary period and its aftermath. Three specific questions motivate the analysis. First, are immigrants, much like the US-born population, becoming less migratory within the country over time? Second, is immigrant dispersal from traditional gateways via internal migration continuing despite considerable economic contraction in many new destination metropolitan areas? Third, is immigration from aboard a substitute for what appears to be declining immigrant internal migration to new destinations? The findings reveal a close correlation between the declining internal migration propensity of the US-born and immigrants in the last two decades. We also observe parallels between the geographies of migration of native- and foreign-born populations with both groups moving to similar metropolitan areas in the 1990s. This redistributive association, however, weakened in the subsequent decade as new destination metropolitan areas lost their appeal for both groups, especially immigrants. There is no evidence to suggest that immigration from abroad is substituting for the decline in immigrant redistribution through internal migration to new destinations. Across destination types the relationship between immigration from abroad and the internal migration of the foreign born remained the same before, during, and after the Great Recession.

Environmental inequality and pollution advantage among immigrants in the United States

“…From 2005 to 2011 there were on average 51 international immigrants per 10,000 people in PUMAs. The average migration rate varied little across time, reaching 54 per 10,000 in 2011 and showing a small dip to 47 immigrants per 10,000 people in 2009, likely related to the economic recession and the U.S. housing bust (Ellis et al, 2014; Johnson, 2013). …”

Do restrictive omnibus immigration laws reduce enrollment in public health insurance by Latino citizen children? A comparative interrupted time series study

“…There is some evidence that, during the study period, both the recession (Ellis et al, 2014a) and state and local immigration laws (Ellis et al, 2016, 2014b; Watson, 2013) influenced where immigrants settled within the US. Low-skilled immigrants—those most likely to be undocumented—disproportionately relocated to states with less restrictive laws after omnibus law passage (Bohn et al, 2014; Ellis et al, 2016, 2014b).…”

Considerations of Methodological Approaches in the Recruitment and Retention of Immigrant Participants

“…Retaining immigrant survey participants in longitudinal studies may be particularly challenging given that internal migration among immigrants to the United States continues to be significant [50]. In addition, the degree of difficulty in tracing some immigrants is likely to vary depending on the legality of their U.S. residence.…”