The greedy giants: Centralized television in post-authoritarian Indonesia

Abstract

This article essentially shows how the development of commercial television in Indonesia has conflicted with the country’s media democratization, as illustrated by the growth of local media in the past 15 years. Compared to print media and radio, which are decentralized, Indonesia’s television industry is dominated by five large media corporations that are all based in the capital city of Jakarta. As a consequence, this fails to leave much growing space to television stations at a local level, which would be needed to strengthen Indonesia’s democratization. Media owners have successfully influenced the government in establishing a set of policies that sustain their dominance of the industry. Players within the television industry have even successfully swayed the direction of the broadcasting decentralization mandated by the Broadcasting Bill during Indonesia’s early political Reform period. The influence of these ‘Jakarta television stations’ stunted the development of television stations outside of Jakarta. Not only it deprives local actors of the economic value of developing their own television industry would bring, it also has resulted in the the loss of television's potential in functioning as a public sphere facilitating social control over democratic processes. Although the Reform era promised a new age of media democratization, the centralization of commercial television actually worsened media monopolies that were thought to have been done away with in post-Suharto Indonesia.

Regularity of a Crisis: Media Framing of the 2015 Transboundary Haze Issue in Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia

“…Meanwhile, the absence of the crisis frame in Indonesia and the dominance of the regular problem frame might be caused by the distance from the haze-choked areas, which are Borneo and Sumatera, both far away from Jakarta or Java. Since the media landscape in Indonesia is highly centralised in Java and Jakarta (Armando, 2014;Lim, 2012;Rochyadi-Reetz & Löffelholz, 2019), much emphasis is not put on other parts of the country including the national government and most citizens of Indonesia, who are highly concentrated in Java, do not suffer directly from the haze. This might create a certain distance from the crisis in Indonesia in comparison to Singapore and Malaysia, which are geographically closer to the location of the forest fires and more directly affected by the haze.…”

Public’s Media Use and Gratification Sought during Corona Virus Outbreak in Indonesia: A National Survey

“…The result that private television was the most relevant information source was not a surprise. Private television is always reported to have the highest audience rating in Indonesia despite its low quality of programming (Indonesia Broadcasting Commission, 2019) and the strong political interests of media ownership in the country (Armando, 2014;Lim, 2012;Rochyadi-Reetz & Löffelholz, 2019;Souisa, 2020). Surprisingly, more than 60% of respondents used public television (TVRI) to get information about the coronavirus outbreak.…”

Against Ahok: An Analysis of Emotion-Driven Movements and Network Power in Jakarta’s 2017 Gubernatorial Election

“…This results in bias media reports and journalist partisanships. Indonesia is one of those countries where most national media networks are owned by politicians or by those who are close to political power (Lim 2012;Armando, 2014;cf. Hallin & Mancini, 2004 (Castells, 2015, p. 9).…”