2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Greedy Gray Code Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we are not interested in shortest paths in pancake networks, but rather Hamilton cycles. There are myriad ways that researchers attempt to build Hamilton cycles in highly-symmetric graphs, and the greedy approach is perhaps the simplest (see Williams [25]). This approach initializes a path at a specific vertex, then repeatedly extends the path by a single edge.…”
Section: (Greedy) Hamilton Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are not interested in shortest paths in pancake networks, but rather Hamilton cycles. There are myriad ways that researchers attempt to build Hamilton cycles in highly-symmetric graphs, and the greedy approach is perhaps the simplest (see Williams [25]). This approach initializes a path at a specific vertex, then repeatedly extends the path by a single edge.…”
Section: (Greedy) Hamilton Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The girths of the burnt Pancake graphs over the hyperoctahedral group was considered in [2]. The (burnt) Pancake graphs are commonly used in computer science to represent interconnection networks [1,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. the ECO framework developed by Bacchelli, Barcucci, Grazzini, and Pergola [2] that generates Gray codes for a variety of combinatorial objects such as Dyck words in constant amortized time per instance; 2. the twisted lexico computation tree by Takaoka [22] that generates Gray codes for multiple combinatorial objects in constant amortized time per instance; 3. loopless algorithms developed by Walsh [25] to generate Gray codes for multiple combinatorial objects, which extend algorithms initially given by Ehrlich in [8]; 4. greedy algorithms observed by Williams [28] that provide a uniform understanding for many previous published results; 5. the reflectable language framework by Li and Sawada [13] for generating Gray codes of k-ary strings, restricted growth strings, and k-ary trees with n nodes; 6. the bubble language framework developed by Ruskey, Sawada and Williams [17] that provides algorithms to generate shift Gray codes for fixed-weight necklaces and Lyndon words, k-ary Dyck words, and representations of interval graphs; 7. the permutation language framework developed by Hartung, Hoang, Mütze and Williams [11] that provides algorithms to generate Gray codes for a variety of combinatorial objects based on encoding them as permutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%