2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13205473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Green Versus Green Trap and a Way Forward

Abstract: Massive deployment of renewables is considered as a decisive step in most countries’ climate efforts. However, at the local scale, it is also perceived by many as a threat to their rich and diverse natural environment. With this perspective, we argue that this green versus green pseudo-dilemma highlights how crucial a broad societal buy-in is. New, transparent, participatory processes and mechanisms that are oriented toward social licensing can now be employed. A novel, integrative research agenda must orbit a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing cost of carbon in tandem with the decreasing cost of RES suggests that the focus of decision makers should not be laid on deciding whether decarbonization policies should be implemented or not, but rather on identifying the optimal speed of such an implementation in order for it to achieve both the economic and energy targets set. However, little evidence has been provided regarding the macroeconomic and societal impact of higher decarbonization speeds [22,88]. In this regard, in this study, we examine the macroeconomic and societal implications of adopting a rapid delignitization scenario relative to a mild one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing cost of carbon in tandem with the decreasing cost of RES suggests that the focus of decision makers should not be laid on deciding whether decarbonization policies should be implemented or not, but rather on identifying the optimal speed of such an implementation in order for it to achieve both the economic and energy targets set. However, little evidence has been provided regarding the macroeconomic and societal impact of higher decarbonization speeds [22,88]. In this regard, in this study, we examine the macroeconomic and societal implications of adopting a rapid delignitization scenario relative to a mild one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with greater knowledge about the humannature relationship, characterized by an ecological attitude, noticed the need to reduce consumption and emissions of pollutants. Therefore, shaping pro-ecological attitudes and the diffusion of knowledge about the real environmental effects of obtaining energy from various sources is crucial for reliable discourse and social participation in shaping the energy transformation [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy democracy connects the renewable transformation with redistributing political and economic power, wealth, and ownership to create a more just and equitable world (Burke and Stephens 2018). The energy democracy frame recognizes the social potential for co-creation and coownership of a renewable future that is much more than a simple substitution of energy technologies (Doukas, Nikas, Stamtsis et al 2020). Rather, the renewable transition provides an opportunity to reverse the economic oppression associated with concentrated wealth and fossil fuel reliance by empowering local energy production and control (Burke 2018).…”
Section: Reframing For Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%