1967
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(67)90134-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The growth of M23C6 carbide on incoherent twin boundaries in austenite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M 23 C 6 was found at numerous sites: a strong presence on grain boundaries, with a globular morphology, on incoherent and coherent twin boundaries (ITB and CTB, respectively) with a plate morphology, and around residual NbN precipitates. All these occurrences are well documented and have been reported on numerous occasions (for example, Lewis and Hattersley, [6] Beckitt and Clarck, [7] Singhal and Martin, [8] and Adamson and Martin [9] ), with the exception of the formation of plates around residual NbX particles. [1] M 23 C 6 has a cube-to-cube orientation relationship with the austenite, and its lattice parameter is 3 times that of the matrix; typical diffraction patterns appear, as shown in Figures 5(d) and (f).…”
Section: A Tem Identification Of the Phases Present In Nf709mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…M 23 C 6 was found at numerous sites: a strong presence on grain boundaries, with a globular morphology, on incoherent and coherent twin boundaries (ITB and CTB, respectively) with a plate morphology, and around residual NbN precipitates. All these occurrences are well documented and have been reported on numerous occasions (for example, Lewis and Hattersley, [6] Beckitt and Clarck, [7] Singhal and Martin, [8] and Adamson and Martin [9] ), with the exception of the formation of plates around residual NbX particles. [1] M 23 C 6 has a cube-to-cube orientation relationship with the austenite, and its lattice parameter is 3 times that of the matrix; typical diffraction patterns appear, as shown in Figures 5(d) and (f).…”
Section: A Tem Identification Of the Phases Present In Nf709mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The good matching crystallographic direction between the matrix and M 23 C 6 is the h1 1 0i directions on {1 1 1} planes [5,31]. Therefore the chromium-rich M 23 C 6 grows in the h110i direction on {1 1 1} plane.…”
Section: The Dependence Of Carbide Morphology On Grain Boundary Charamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, if M 23 C 6 bars could form by the repeated nucleation on a migrating dislocation, such bars might have been commonly observed elsewhere in the matrix, because M 23 C 6 also nucleate on dislocations inside grains. According to the work of Singhal and Martin [31], stacking faults are created by the gliding of dislocations from the incoherent twin boundary. M 23 C 6 grows across the faults forming bars.…”
Section: The Morphology Of Carbides Precipitated At Incoherent Twin Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be located in grain boundaries (GBs) [30,31], twin boundaries (TBs) [32][33][34] and intragranular sites [30,32]. M 23 C 6 most often appears in GBs where it may control the nucleation of creep cavities [30] and is often connected to intergranular corrosion due to depletion of chromium at GBs [13,35,36].…”
Section: Carbides and Nitridesmentioning
confidence: 99%