1963
DOI: 10.1086/449993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Growth of Output and Employment in Basic Sectors of the Chilean Economy, 1908-1957

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 A recent review of the theory for Latin America (Gregorio and Rodríguez 2011). 20 The author considers Industrial GDP from (Ballesteros and Davis 1963) which is considered optimistic (Ducoing and Badia-Miró 2013). 21 Other authors as Díaz and Wagner (2004) and Lüders and Wagner (2003) reinforce this hypothesis.…”
Section: Industrial Performance During the Mining Boommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 A recent review of the theory for Latin America (Gregorio and Rodríguez 2011). 20 The author considers Industrial GDP from (Ballesteros and Davis 1963) which is considered optimistic (Ducoing and Badia-Miró 2013). 21 Other authors as Díaz and Wagner (2004) and Lüders and Wagner (2003) reinforce this hypothesis.…”
Section: Industrial Performance During the Mining Boommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chile: 1940-76 from ECLA (1978. The series is completed backwards for 1908-39 using the estimates of the rate of growth of manufacturing output in Ballesteros and Davis (1963). These authors assumed constant values during the years 1913-16.…”
Section: Appendix I Population and Territorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Argentina, money supply from Halperin (1968), wages from Di Tella and Zymelman (1973), trade and government totals from Chu (1972); for Brazil, monetary data from Neuhaus (1975), prices, trade and government from the Anuario Estatistico. Chile: wages from Estudistica Chilena, industrial and total output from Ballesteros and Davis (1963), using their cited CEPAL data after 1925, and their own index 1920-1925. This follows Mamalakis (1978), although it is interesting to note that CEPAL (1978) does not include their own pre-1940 estimates for Chile.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%