2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GUM perspective on straight-line errors-in-variables regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in [17], the uncertainty matrix of parameter estimates derived from ISO does not strictly follow the law of propagation of uncertainty as defined in GUM and its supplements, which could lead to obvious differences especially in situations with an implicit measurement model and large combined measurement uncertainties of the variables involved. The authors argue that the uncertainties correctly derived based on the LPU are always larger than the uncertainties based on the ISO approach proposed in [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed in [17], the uncertainty matrix of parameter estimates derived from ISO does not strictly follow the law of propagation of uncertainty as defined in GUM and its supplements, which could lead to obvious differences especially in situations with an implicit measurement model and large combined measurement uncertainties of the variables involved. The authors argue that the uncertainties correctly derived based on the LPU are always larger than the uncertainties based on the ISO approach proposed in [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X, and Y are the input quantities and a, b, and µ are the output quantities. The measurement model ( 5) is nonlinear and implicit, see [17].…”
Section: Linear Comparative Calibration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), a common text for the metrological determination of the measurement value [ 33 ], the uncertainty of the calibration target can be evaluated by applying the (linear) law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU) to the abscissa. Therefore, for a generalized approach with the non-diagonalized SR matrix, an analytical process to derive the variance–covariance matrix of regression coefficients has been demonstrated only for particular cases wherein the correlation between variables does not disturb the derivation of the explicit variance–covariance formulae [ 33 ]. For chemical or biological RMs prepared from the same mother material, one may reasonably assume a strong correlation between these uncertainties [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%