2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08797-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gut microbiome of exudivorous marmosets in the wild and captivity

Abstract: Mammalian captive dietary specialists like folivores are prone to gastrointestinal distress and primate dietary specialists suffer the greatest gut microbiome diversity losses in captivity compared to the wild. Marmosets represent another group of dietary specialists, exudivores that eat plant exudates, but whose microbiome remains relatively less studied. The common occurrence of gastrointestinal distress in captive marmosets prompted us to study the Callithrix gut microbiome composition and predictive functi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspected that dominant microbiota exerts some influence on the difference in microbiota function, which was in accordance with previous studies (Lian et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2019). Hybridization exerts some influences on gut bacteria, and the changes in the hybrids' gut microbiota may affect gene expression and fitness of the host (Malukiewicz et al, 2022), and lead to favourable physiological functions in some cases (Seehausen et al, 2014). However, PICRUSt, as a functional prediction tool, should be interpreted with caution when applied to fish rather than human microbial ecology due to the lack of representation of fishassociated microorganisms in genomic databases (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We suspected that dominant microbiota exerts some influence on the difference in microbiota function, which was in accordance with previous studies (Lian et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2019). Hybridization exerts some influences on gut bacteria, and the changes in the hybrids' gut microbiota may affect gene expression and fitness of the host (Malukiewicz et al, 2022), and lead to favourable physiological functions in some cases (Seehausen et al, 2014). However, PICRUSt, as a functional prediction tool, should be interpreted with caution when applied to fish rather than human microbial ecology due to the lack of representation of fishassociated microorganisms in genomic databases (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Contrary to previous studies that reported higher alpha diversity in the gut microbiota of wild primate populations, such as Japanese macaques [31], Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys [32], and spider monkeys [33], compared to those in captivity, our research revealed an unexpected pattern of low bacterial diversity in the gut microbiota of wild black capuchin monkeys. On the other hand, our results align with a study conducted on other primates from Brazil, Brazilian marmosets Callithrix spp., where rectal samples indicated lower richness in the gut microbiome of wild animals compared to translocated and captive individuals [20]. Low richness in fecal microbiomes has also been observed in other wild animals, such as rhinoceroses [34], pangolins [35], and white-lipped deer [36], compared to those in captivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Despite Brazil harboring one of the world's most diverse primate populations, there are still few studies investigating the gut microbiome [19,20]. The microbiota provides valuable insights into animal health and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marmoset cranial shape and musculature, dentition, in addition to digestive features [48, 49, 50, 51], support Callithrix exudivory by allowing marmosets to gouge and scrape hard plant surfaces to access and digest natural exudate sources made of hard to digest oligosaccharides [48, 52, 53, 54, 51, 50, 49, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60]. However, interspecific differences in marmoset cranial shape and dentition Callithrix species are linked to intersepcific differences in exudivory specializaiton [52, 61, 62, 63], with C. jacchus and C. penicillata representing the extreme of marmoset exudivory specialization and C. aurita being the least specialized [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%