2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.01728
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GW190521 Mass Gap Event and the Primordial Black Hole Scenario

V. De Luca,
V. Desjacques,
G. Franciolini
et al.

Abstract: The LIGO/Virgo Collaboration has recently observed GW190521, the first binary black hole merger with at least the primary component mass in the mass gap predicted by the pair-instability supernova theory. This observation disfavors the standard stellar-origin formation scenario for the heavier black hole, motivating alternative hypotheses. We show that GW190521 cannot be explained within the Primordial Black Hole (PBH) scenario if PBHs do not accrete during their cosmological evolution, since this would requir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several alternative explanations for the occurrence of GW190521 have also been put forward, ranging from critically assessing uncertainties in the lower edge of the mass gap, 47,53,228,229 Population III stars at very low-metallicity, 53,54,230 accretion onto either stellar-origin 58,59,213 or primordial 231,232 BHs, and stellar mergers. 37,55,56 Additional speculations include invoking beyond-standard-model physics 233,234 exotic compact objects, 235,236 and dark-matter annihilation.…”
Section: Gw190521mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative explanations for the occurrence of GW190521 have also been put forward, ranging from critically assessing uncertainties in the lower edge of the mass gap, 47,53,228,229 Population III stars at very low-metallicity, 53,54,230 accretion onto either stellar-origin 58,59,213 or primordial 231,232 BHs, and stellar mergers. 37,55,56 Additional speculations include invoking beyond-standard-model physics 233,234 exotic compact objects, 235,236 and dark-matter annihilation.…”
Section: Gw190521mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has naturally promoted proposals in which BHs in GW190521 are not products of standard stellar evolution. These proposals include dynamical formation scenarios of repeated BH mergers in dense clusters (Rizzuto et al 2020;Fragione et al 2020;Gayathri et al 2020), repeated stellar mergers in dense clusters (Kremer et al 2020), primordial black holes (De Luca et al 2020). Some more exotic scenarios are also being put forward such as head-on collisions of boson stars (Calderón Bustillo et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should note that there are many proposals and discussions to explain BHs within the PISN mass gap and their dynamics immediately after the announcement of GW190521 (Carr et al 2019;Calderón Bustillo et al 2020a;Sakstein et al 2020;De Luca et al 2020;Vovchenko et al 2020;Wang et al 2020;Moffat 2020;Romero-Shaw et al 2020;Fragione et al 2020a;Calderón Bustillo et al 2020b;Gayathri et al 2020;Fishbach & Holz 2020;Farrell et al 2020), including modified gravity, primordial BHs, orbital eccentricity, numerical relativity simulations, repeated mergers in a dense star cluster, BH masses from Pop III stars and so on.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%