2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The H2O and O2 exospheres of Ganymede: The result of a complex interaction between the jovian magnetospheric ions and the icy moon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Plainaki et al () proposed an innovative method (accurate to an order of magnitude; see Table ) of estimating of expected O 2 production from ion‐irradiated “warm” ice (> ~100 K) at Europa and Ganymede, which they inferred from the temperature‐dependent part of the total sputtering equation of Fama et al (). However, the applicability of the Plainaki et al () method (as updated by Plainaki et al () and Milillo et al ()) to other (possibly colder) icy solar system objects is uncertain because Fama et al () did not elucidate the contribution of O 2 to the sputtered ejecta for ices below ~100 K and did not model the projectile species and energy dependence of the O 2 :H 2 O ratio in the ejecta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Plainaki et al () proposed an innovative method (accurate to an order of magnitude; see Table ) of estimating of expected O 2 production from ion‐irradiated “warm” ice (> ~100 K) at Europa and Ganymede, which they inferred from the temperature‐dependent part of the total sputtering equation of Fama et al (). However, the applicability of the Plainaki et al () method (as updated by Plainaki et al () and Milillo et al ()) to other (possibly colder) icy solar system objects is uncertain because Fama et al () did not elucidate the contribution of O 2 to the sputtered ejecta for ices below ~100 K and did not model the projectile species and energy dependence of the O 2 :H 2 O ratio in the ejecta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the breaking and topological rearrangement of magnetic field lines in a plasma, resulting in the conversion of magnetic field energy to plasma kinetic and thermal energy) could lead to some sputtering of surface material at low latitudes from recently trapped particles; in those regions, however, such a process is expected to have lower rates than in the polar caps. Recent simulations by Plainaki et al (2015) of Ganymede's sputter-induced water exosphere support this scenario. In contrast to Ganymede, the entire surface of Europa is bombarded by Jovian plasma (maximum precipitating flux is at the trailing hemisphere apex), suggesting that sputter-induced redistribution of water molecules is a viable means of brightening the satellite's surface.…”
Section: Space Weather Interactions In the Solar Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The moon exosphere source-loss balance, consequently, depends on a complex pattern of planetary space weather conditions. Plainaki et al (2015) used previously published estimates of plasma parameters (McNutt et al 1981;Scudder et al 1981;Gurnett et al 1996;Eviatar et al 2001;Kivelson et al 2004) to calculate the rates of the most important plasma-moon interactions leading to the loss of Ganymede's exosphere. They found that the loss rate for H 2 O in the polar caps is due to its charge exchange with ionospheric O 2 + whereas in the closed magnetic field lines region, the H 2 O loss rate is lower by almost one order of magnitude and is mainly due to charge exchange between ionospheric O + and H 2 O.…”
Section: Space Weather At the Galilean Moonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations