1949
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.1401.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…69 In this sample, language functioning was relatively unimpaired. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised 70 was administered to a sample in New York City.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 In this sample, language functioning was relatively unimpaired. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised 70 was administered to a sample in New York City.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the clinical groups only, AST errors, particularly pronunciation errors, were related negatively to WRAT reading and spelling scores. The Reitan and Wolfson (1988) severity ratings for AST items did not improve group discrimination.The Reitan-Indiana Aphasia Screening Test (AST) is Reitan's (Reitan, 1984) 32-item modification of the 5 l-item instrument originally developed by Halstead and Wepman (1949). The AST has been validated carefully on neurologically diagnosed patient groups (Wheeler, 1963;Wheeler & Reitan, 1962) in order to identify "pathognomonic signs" of brain dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief review will help to distinguish these approaches and will provide a basis for establishing what the appropriate use of this test might be. Halstead and Wepman (1949) report that the original AST devised by Halstead at the outset of World War I1 contained 40 scored responses from 30 stimulus items presented on a cardboard disk device. A slightly revised version was adopted by the US Army in 1945.…”
Section: Perceptual Deficits In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halstead and Wepman (1949) as a quick test for categorizing type of aphasia. Later it was advocated for use in detecting and categorizing (localizing) lesions.…”
Section: Perceptual Deficits In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%