2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-92148-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Harmony Integration Workbench

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also validated that the mapping accuracy of GEM is significantly higher (by about 15% for each of precision and recall) than that achieved by two (generic) schema-matching software tools with the same datasets. These other tools are Harmony 24 and Coma++ 1 . The GEM system was designed with a focus on the Alzheimer's disease and other medical domain, and is able to maximally leverage information in the data documentation that other generic matching tools cannot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also validated that the mapping accuracy of GEM is significantly higher (by about 15% for each of precision and recall) than that achieved by two (generic) schema-matching software tools with the same datasets. These other tools are Harmony 24 and Coma++ 1 . The GEM system was designed with a focus on the Alzheimer's disease and other medical domain, and is able to maximally leverage information in the data documentation that other generic matching tools cannot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After interviewing A2E engineers, we realized two of these tools, the Harmony Schema matcher [8] and the Affinity schema cluster visualization tool [16], significantly simplify two current A2E challenges, described in Section 4 as the first two use cases: "data migration" and "data consolidation".…”
Section: Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Format heterogeneity has also been addressed by metadata repositories with neutral metamodels, as in the OpenII SchemaStore repository for schema metadata [7], whose extension into the BDE arena we discuss in Section 5. Using a neutral metamodel and importers / exporters from and to several popular data models is an alternative to developing a new converter for each pair of models which must interoperate [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large corpus of literature is available on various matching approaches and algorithms (e.g., see [43,17]). To identify the set A of matches between two schemas s i and s j the operator A ← match(s i , s j , [d i , d j ]) can be used, which uses existing schema-, and if optional instance data is available from data sources d i and d j , instance-based matchers [16,41,3]. Examples of matchers include string based matchers using, e.g., edit distance or n-grams to determine how similar two strings are, data type matchers comparing the data types of constructs, or structure-based matchers comparing the structure of constructs within a schema such as the nesting of elements in XSD.…”
Section: Match and Infer Schematic Correspondences Between Schemasmentioning
confidence: 99%