2001
DOI: 10.1080/07494460100640121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The harpsichord works of Iannis Xenakis

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Doch neben den beinahe unspielbaren gibt es auch die tatsächlich unspielbaren Werke, die aus physiologischen Gründen nicht so zu bewältigen sind, wie sie notiert wurden. Eine Komposition, die in diese Kategorie fällt, ist das 1989 komponierte Duo für Cembalo und Perkussion Oophaa von Iannis Xenakis (1922-2001…”
Section: Unspielbare Musikunclassified
“…Doch neben den beinahe unspielbaren gibt es auch die tatsächlich unspielbaren Werke, die aus physiologischen Gründen nicht so zu bewältigen sind, wie sie notiert wurden. Eine Komposition, die in diese Kategorie fällt, ist das 1989 komponierte Duo für Cembalo und Perkussion Oophaa von Iannis Xenakis (1922-2001…”
Section: Unspielbare Musikunclassified
“…He developed this method since the mid-1960s and discussed it through several essays ( Xenakis, 1965 , 1966 , 1967 , 1968 , 1988 , 1990 ) without any reference to the term “gears.” One of his articles provided an important account of several compositional choices around his piece Nomos Alpha (1965–1966) for cello solo that helped several analysts delve into its mathematical features ( Vandenbogaerde, 1968 ; DeLio, 1980 ; Vriend, 1981 ; Solomos, 1997 ; Peck, 2003 ). Other scholars have equally approached his sieves seeking to analyze further pieces within Xenakis’ oeuvre (e.g., Flint, 1993 , 2001 ; Bertocchi, 2001 ; Pace, 2001 ; Squibbs, 2002 , 2003 ; Exarchos, 2007 ; Gibson, 2011 , p. 81–114), to understand the mathematical details of the composer’s approach (e.g., Gibson, 2001 ; Jones, 2001 ; Exarchos, 2009 ), to contextualize the relationships between this approach and others he already developed (e.g., Barthel-Calvet, 2012 ; Hoffmann, 2019 ), to derive computational models (e.g., Agon et al, 2004 ; Ariza, 2005 ), to borrow sieves for their own compositional purposes (e.g., Tipei, 1987 , 1989 ), or as a formal framework for analyzing other repertoires ( Noll et al, 2006 ). To the best of our knowledge, there is only one work providing cognitive remarks upon Xenakis’ sieves, and again in quite general terms ( Besada, 2019 , p. 265–267).…”
Section: From Sieve Theory To Xenakis’ Compositional Sievesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komboï (1981), written for harpsichord and percussion, is based entirely on a single non-octave-repeating scale, spanning six octaves, with few exceptions of pitches alien to the scale being used throughout the work (Pace, 2001, p. 129). As noted by (Pace, 2001), "the use of the same scale, or filters thereof, provides a very marked harmonic consistency. The one exception to this rule (cr 313-319) is all the more sharply contrasted as a result" (p. 131).…”
Section: A Single Scalementioning
confidence: 97%