2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hausdorff dimension of multivariate operator-self-similar Gaussian random fields

Abstract: Abstract. Let {X(t) : t ∈ R d } be a multivariate operator-self-similar random field with values in R m . Such fields were introduced in [24] and satisfy the scaling d in the Gaussian case. In particular, we enlighten the property that the Hausdorff dimension is determined by the real parts of the eigenvalues of E and D as well as the multiplicity of the eigenvalues of E.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with Corollary 3.7, a comparison with (3.12) directly shows that this value coincides with s(c D , c q ) for any c ∈ (0, 1), indicating that the lower bound in Theorem 3.6 is in fact equal to the Hausdorff dimension of the range for the harmonizable representation of any (E, D)-operator-self-similar stable random field. All the above results also hold for a moving average representation of the random field in the Gaussian case α = 2 as shown in [45]. However, for a corresponding moving average representation in the stable case α ∈ (0, 2), constructed in [33], it is questionable if our results are applicable, since these fields do not share the same Hölder continuity properties and thus the joint measurability of sample functions (assumption (iv) in the Introduction) may be violated; cf.…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 52%
“…In accordance with Corollary 3.7, a comparison with (3.12) directly shows that this value coincides with s(c D , c q ) for any c ∈ (0, 1), indicating that the lower bound in Theorem 3.6 is in fact equal to the Hausdorff dimension of the range for the harmonizable representation of any (E, D)-operator-self-similar stable random field. All the above results also hold for a moving average representation of the random field in the Gaussian case α = 2 as shown in [45]. However, for a corresponding moving average representation in the stable case α ∈ (0, 2), constructed in [33], it is questionable if our results are applicable, since these fields do not share the same Hölder continuity properties and thus the joint measurability of sample functions (assumption (iv) in the Introduction) may be violated; cf.…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 52%
“…it is not supported on any proper hyperplane in R m . As noted above, Sönmez [33] studied the sample path properties of X α in the Gaussian case α = 2. We will derive similar results in this paper for X α with α ∈ (0, 2).…”
Section: Harmonizable Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 4.1 compared to [33,Proposition 4.6] shows that (E, D)-operator-selfsimilar stable random fields share the same kind of upper bound for the modulus of continuity as the Gaussian ones. Therefore it is natural to have also the same results of [33,Theorem 4.1] for the Hausdorff dimension of their images and graphs on [0, 1] d , which we state in the next Section. Furthermore, we refer the reader to [14,28] for the definition and properties of the Hausdorff dimension.…”
Section: Modulus Of Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations