2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hazard of fondaparinux in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19: Retrospective controlled study versus enoxaparin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of heparin treatment of COVID-19 have shown positive results 103 , 106 (Supplementary Table 1 ), and this is now one of a growing number of agents available to manage COVID-19 either as a prophylactic or therapeutic regimen 108 (Table 1 ). The use of fondaparinux (a selective indirect antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitor) in patients with COVID-19 was reported in two papers, with contrasting results about its safety 109 , 110 . The same applies to direct oral anticoagulants, the use of which in patients with COVID-19 has been little studied to date 111 , 112 .…”
Section: Thrombosis Management In Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of heparin treatment of COVID-19 have shown positive results 103 , 106 (Supplementary Table 1 ), and this is now one of a growing number of agents available to manage COVID-19 either as a prophylactic or therapeutic regimen 108 (Table 1 ). The use of fondaparinux (a selective indirect antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitor) in patients with COVID-19 was reported in two papers, with contrasting results about its safety 109 , 110 . The same applies to direct oral anticoagulants, the use of which in patients with COVID-19 has been little studied to date 111 , 112 .…”
Section: Thrombosis Management In Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four out of 22 studies (18%) investigated development of thrombotic complications as a major endpoint [94,96,105,108]. Only in two of them was a multivariable analysis presented, showing a protective effect of anticoagulant agents (Table S1 -118], all retrospective, could be included in this section, of which 13 compared prophylactic dosages vs. subtherapeutic/therapeutic dosages and only two compared prophylactic enoxaparin vs. prophylactic fondaparinux, showing no striking differences in the performed unadjusted comparisons [101,118]. With regard to the comparison of prophylactic vs. therapeutic dosages, mortality was the endpoint (or one of the endpoints) of major interest in 9/13 studies (69%), in most cases with no relevant differences between prophylactic dosages and therapeutic dosages in adjusted comparisons (when available).…”
Section: Comparison Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the significant effect of combined LMWH plus methylprednisolone administration (G4) on treatment failure appears to be more consistently in patients with SpO 2 / the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. [16,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, several therapeutic interventions have been proposed to mitigate the inflammatory organ injury in viral COVID-19 disease and, consequently, to reduce the hypercoagulable state [13]. Anticoagulant therapy for the management of patients with pneumonia from SARS-CoV-2 infection is widely discussed [10,[14][15][16][17]; recent retrospective studies seem to show a positive effect on the prognosis [10,14,[18][19][20][21]. Moreover, current trials also showed the improvement of clinical outcomes due to the administration of corticosteroids in critical patients [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%