1982
DOI: 10.1039/dc9827300205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The He–N2anisotropic Van der Waals potential. Test of a simple model using state-to-state differential scattering cross-sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous work [14] on N2-He we found that for the interaction second virial coefficients, the shear viscosity and binary diffusion coefficients, the HFD1 surface was the only one to predict values within most of the experimental error bars. However, for the same system, neither of the HFD1 or HFD2 surfaces agreed well with the total differential collision cross section data of Faubel et al [55], but both gave results that agreed reasonably well with the inelastic state-tostate differential collision cross sections [55]. At the moment, it seems that no single currently available recipe for determining the anisotropic damping factor p(y) is adequate for obtaining accurate HFD potential energy surfaces for such systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In our previous work [14] on N2-He we found that for the interaction second virial coefficients, the shear viscosity and binary diffusion coefficients, the HFD1 surface was the only one to predict values within most of the experimental error bars. However, for the same system, neither of the HFD1 or HFD2 surfaces agreed well with the total differential collision cross section data of Faubel et al [55], but both gave results that agreed reasonably well with the inelastic state-tostate differential collision cross sections [55]. At the moment, it seems that no single currently available recipe for determining the anisotropic damping factor p(y) is adequate for obtaining accurate HFD potential energy surfaces for such systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…9 The cross section falls off rapidly by several orders of magnitude over an angular range of a very few degrees, after which it flattens out and becomes marked by oscillations, which have been attributed to Fraunhofer shadow diffraction from the hard core of the potential. 10 Fraunhofer diffraction has been observed for many systems in He-molecule scattering and has been shown to provide a sensitive measure of the distance at which the repulsive and attractive forces just cancel each other. 11 At even larger angles molecular scattering is dominated by the hard-core repulsive potential.…”
Section: Observation Of Interference Oscillations In Helium Scatterinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a "near-side/far-side" analysis 15 of state-to-state differential cross sections as functions of the center-of-mass scattering angle, Stoecklin et al 13 have shown that the available data, 16,17 which span scattering energies of 220-250 cm −1 , are only marginally able to distinguish among the semiempirical XC͑fit͒ PES of Ref. 8 and the ab initio ͑"MTE" and BCCD͒ PESs of Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%