1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00848640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts

Abstract: In a recent publication in this journal (Berking 1983) it was claimed (1) that the head inhibitor we isolated from hydra is a Dowex artefact, (2) that a separate foot inhibitor does not exist in hydra and (3) that the only inhibitor that has so far been isolated from hydra is one which inhibits head and foot regeneration equally well. These statements are incorrect and require a response. In the following, I would like to summarise our evidence that the inhibitors isolated from hydra, including Berking's inhib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following application of gel permeation one active fraction was detected which antagonizes both head and foot regeneration [12,13,14]. A separation into a fraction which specifically antagonizes head regeneration and a fraction which specifically antagonizes foot regeneration [2,15] was in the following argued to be an artifact [14]. We have used a separation procedure based on a head regeneration assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following application of gel permeation one active fraction was detected which antagonizes both head and foot regeneration [12,13,14]. A separation into a fraction which specifically antagonizes head regeneration and a fraction which specifically antagonizes foot regeneration [2,15] was in the following argued to be an artifact [14]. We have used a separation procedure based on a head regeneration assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head regeneration was studied in budless animals one day after the last feeding [2,[12][13][14][15]. The animals were sectioned at about one half of the body length and the aboral (foot-bearing) fragments were studied.…”
Section: The Assay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that in head regenerating tissue the concentration of head inhibitor dropped to almost zero indicates that no component derived from the resin was present. A detailed discussion will be published elsewhere [21].…”
Section: Separation Of Joot From Head Inhibitor In Crude Extractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addition of head inhibitor to the medium of regenerating animals reversibly blocks their development [3]. At low concentrations (-=lo-' M) it retards specifically head and not foot regeneration [21,25]. The head inhibitor also interferes with budding Within the animal, the head-specific substances are stored in a structure-bound form, probably in nerve cells [2, 231.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%