1995
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-199504000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Head Injury Family Interview: A clinical and research tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCL from the New York Head Injury Family Interview (Kay, Cavallo, Ezrachi, & Vavagiakis, 1995) consists of 43 items, each reportedly a common TBI complaint. The three factors reported by Kay et al (1995) for the PCL are Affective/Behavioral (14 items), Cognitive (9 items), and Physical/Dependency (8 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PCL from the New York Head Injury Family Interview (Kay, Cavallo, Ezrachi, & Vavagiakis, 1995) consists of 43 items, each reportedly a common TBI complaint. The three factors reported by Kay et al (1995) for the PCL are Affective/Behavioral (14 items), Cognitive (9 items), and Physical/Dependency (8 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three factors reported by Kay et al (1995) for the PCL are Affective/Behavioral (14 items), Cognitive (9 items), and Physical/Dependency (8 items). The remaining 12 items include 10 introduced in a later version of the PCL, for which factor-analyses were not reported, and 2 items involving sexual drive which were omitted by many respondents in their study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The awareness questionnaire used in this study was also used in Kay, Cavallo, and Ezrachi (1995).The questionnaire contains 33 items across six domains (physical, cognitive, memory, behavioral, emotional, and executive).…”
Section: Self-awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the validity of this study is probably due to clinical experience and the items are the same or almost the same as those in the RPQ (19) and the Problem Checklist (20). A comparison of different questionnaires will be made in a forthcoming study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the event of a ''Yes'', the patient was asked to rate the severity of the problem in the range 1 Á/7. As the present study is part of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of MTBI, which ran for 4 years (from 6 September 1997 to 31 December 2001) in the area of Borås, Sweden (21), the RCT study was initially designed before the RPQ (28) and the Problem Checklist (20) were introduced. We therefore constructed a new PCS questionnaire (PCSQ) to determine whether there were any PCS after the MTBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%