The Health and Wellbeing of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples around the Globe: Ensuring and Promoting Best Practice in Research

Griffiths, Kalinda; Diaz, Abbey; Whop, Lisa J.; Cunningham, Joan

doi:10.3390/ijerph19010261

Cited by 16 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We hope these conversations create space for all researchers, funding agencies and journals to explore options to broaden this position statement beyond the publishing stage so the research process is culturally robust from conception to completion to avoid 'end of pipeline' rhetoric and tokenism. Specifically, Indigenous knowledges, ethics, processes and protocols need to be embedded into all stages of the research process [15], including: � cultivating community owned proposals; � research team recruitment and leadership; � culturally responsive methodologies; � strengthening community capacity; � delivering community focused outcomes; � communicating outcomes with cultural appropriate knowledge exchange medias; and � following up and engaging communities on research impact including impact evaluation approaches established at project outset.…”

Section: Let's Normalize Part Of An Indigenous Nation As Perfectly Va...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action

Roach

McMillan

2022

PLOS Glob Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Let's Normalize Part Of An Indigenous Nation As Perfectly Va...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action

Roach

McMillan

2022

PLOS Glob Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As Griffiths et al (2021:3) note, this information 'is not typically reported in academic manuscripts, despite it being central to Indigenous and Tribal peoples' research paradigms, as well as a practical step towards decolonising research'. Initial examinations of the Bharti et al (2015) model indicated that it captured important aspects of the collaboration process identified by Griffiths et al (2021) such as the nature of Aboriginal peoples' engagement (Pillar 1: Interactive Environment); involvement (Pillar 3: Co-production); leadership and research governance considerations (Pillar 5: Management Structure); and whether the work reflected Aboriginal peoples' priorities (Pillar 4: Benefits). As such the model was considered suitable to examine a project bringing together Aboriginal and Western methodologies.…”

Section: A Focus On the Co-creation Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The challenges can be amplified for marginalised groups where there is the very real threat of actually doing harm and perpetuating marginalisation through research. This article seeks to impact the practice of marketing researchers by examining how Bharti et al’s (2015) model of value co-creation can help research teams to work together, in culturally sensitive and safe ways, to privilege the voices of marginalised groups and maximise value for all stakeholders (Griffiths et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Yindyamarra: Value Co-creation with Aboriginal Australians

Lawrence

Lock

Kleinschafer

et al. 2022

International Journal of Market Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bringing together individuals of diverse perspectives in a research team can be challenging, especially when one perspective has been largely unacknowledged. The phrase ‘Value co-creation’ is used in marketing to include the voice of the consumer in the development of offerings so as to create value for both the organisation and the consumer. This study examines how well value co-creation model captures a process of research collaboration that privileges marginalised voices in a culturally sensitive and safe way. We examine a project that brought together three different, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, groups of people: Aboriginal community members; health care practitioners, policymakers and marketing experts. It is revealed that the value co-creation model exemplifies many of the elements needed to weave together different methodological perspectives and manage the dynamics of a research team. However, some adaptations were required, particularly: the inclusion of a ‘cultural broker’; a means of ‘cultural governance’; and the addition of a sixth pillar to the model – ‘evaluation’.

show abstract

“…It was in 2007 that the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous peoples, Article 2 stated ‘the right to be free from any kind of discrimination, in the exercise of their rights, in particular that based on their indigenous origin or identity’ 20 . The ICIRAS would be a lever for embedding the rights of Indigenous peoples into academic publishing governance, as aligned to the movement for embedding human rights in research with Indigenous and Tribal peoples 21 …”

Section: Why a Standard?mentioning

confidence: 99%

ICIRAS: Research and reconciliation with indigenous peoples in rural health journals

Lock

McMillan

Warne

et al. 2022

Australian J Rural Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim We aim to promote discussion about an Indigenous Cultural Identity of Research Authors Standard (ICIRAS) for academic journal publications. Context This is based on a gap in research publishing practice where Indigenous peoples' identity is not systematically and rigorously flagged in rural health research publications. There are widespread reforms, in different research areas, to counter the reputation of scientific research as a vehicle of racism and discrimination against the world's Indigenous peoples. Reflecting on these broader movements, the editorial teams of three rural health journals—the Australian Journal of Rural Health, the Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, and Rural and Remote Health—recognised that Indigenous peoples' identity could be embedded in authorship details. Approach An environmental scan (through a cultural safety lens where Indigenous cultural authority is respected, valued, and empowered) of literature was undertaken to detect the signs of inclusion of Indigenous peoples in research. This revealed many ways in which editorial boards of Journals could systematically improve their process so that there is ‘nothing about Indigenous people, without Indigenous people’ in rural health research publications. Conclusion Improving the health and wellbeing of Indigenous peoples worldwide requires high quality research evidence. The philosophy of cultural safety supports the purposeful positioning of Indigenous peoples within the kaleidoscope of cultural knowledges as identified contributors and authors of research evidence. The ICIRAS is a call‐to‐action for research journals and institutions to rigorously improve publication governance that signals “Editing with IndigenUs and for IndigenUs”.

show abstract

The Health and Wellbeing of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples around the Globe: Ensuring and Promoting Best Practice in Research

Abstract: Indigenous and Tribal peoples account for approximately 6 [...]

Cited by 16 publications

References 41 publications

Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action

Reconciliation and Indigenous self-determination in health research: A call to action

Yindyamarra: Value Co-creation with Aboriginal Australians

ICIRAS: Research and reconciliation with indigenous peoples in rural health journals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About