The health outcomes and costs of people attending an interdisciplinary chronic disease service in regional Australia: protocol for a longitudinal cohort investigation

Abstract

BackgroundRates of chronic disease are escalating around the world. To date health service evaluations have focused on interventions for single chronic diseases. However, evaluations of the effectiveness of new intervention strategies that target single chronic diseases as well as multimorbidity are required, particularly in areas outside major metropolitan centres where access to services, such as specialist care, is difficult and where the retention and recruitment of health professionals affects service provision.MethodsThis study is a longitudinal investigation with a baseline and three follow-up assessments comparing the health and health costs of people with chronic disease before and after intervention at a chronic disease clinic, in regional Australia. The clinic is led by students under the supervision of health professionals. The study will provide preliminary evidence regarding the effectiveness of the intervention, and evaluate the influence of a range of factors on the health outcomes and costs of the patients attending the clinic. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (intake to the service), and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months after intake to the service. Health will be measured using the SF-36 and health costs will be measured using government and medical record sources. The intervention involves students and health professionals from multiple professions working together to treat patients with programs that include education and exercise therapy programs for back pain, and Healthy Lifestyle programs; as well as individual consultations involving single professions.DiscussionUnderstanding the effect of a range of factors on the health state and health costs of people attending an interdisciplinary clinic will inform health service provision for this clinical group and will determine which factors need to be controlled for in future observational studies. Preliminary evidence regarding changes in health and health costs associated with the intervention will be a platform for future clinical trials of intervention effectiveness. The results will be of interest to teams investigating new chronic disease programs particularly for people with multimorbidity, and in areas outside major metropolitan centres.Trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12611000724976

Development of the Rapid Assessment, Prioritisation and Referral Tool (RAPaRT) for multidisciplinary teams in emergency care settings

“…Investigation of pragmatic aspects of RAPaRT implementation may include determining the most efficient (and reliable) method of completing the instrument, where self-administration, proxy administration, health professional administration or administration by an allied health assistant are worthy of consideration 20. The impact on health service outcomes (including patient flow, volume and timing of referrals), as well as patient outcomes,21 from implementing the RAPaRT in emergency health services, are also important future research directions. This may include evaluation of the clinical and economic impact of using a single positive response to trigger a referral versus two or more positive responses based on real life clinical data.…”

Health-related quality of life of people with multimorbidity at a community-based, interprofessional student-assisted clinic: Implications for assessment and intervention

“…14,15 The psychometric properties of the SF-36 relevant to this study for people with chronic disease have been reported elsewhere. 16 The SF-36 dimensions were scored on a 0 to 100 percentage scale with 0 indicating the worst health state and 100 the best health state. Four dimensions (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) have been found to cluster most strongly on a physical component of HRQoL and four dimensions (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health) have been found to cluster most strongly on a mental component of HRQoL.…”

Accessibility of Primary, Specialist, and Allied Health Services for Aboriginal People Living in Rural and Remote Communities: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study

“…Ultimately, this study will provide insights into how to better provide health care services for Aboriginal people in rural and remote communities. The findings will also contribute to the broader literature of rural and remote health service provision [ 30 ] and provide recommendations for future practice, which if adopted could lead to improvement of population health services.…”