2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4974-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The health-related social costs of alcohol in Belgium

Abstract: BackgroundAlcohol is associated with adverse health effects causing a considerable economic impact to society. A reliable estimate of this economic impact for Belgium is lacking. This is the aim of the study.MethodsA prevalence-based approach estimating the direct, indirect and intangible costs for the year 2012 was used. Attributional fractions for a series of health effects were derived from literature. The human capital approach was used to estimate indirect costs, while the concept of disability-adjusted l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a certain amount of the potential economic output is not produced because of alcohol effects and this category of losses (referred to as ‘indirect costs’) encompasses premature mortality, inability to work, decreased productivity and incarceration [8,9,10,11]. Some studies also attempt to attribute economic value to pain, suffering and the decline in the quality of life due to alcohol (‘intangible costs’) [12,13]; however, this cost category does not represent either the real or potential loss of material resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, a certain amount of the potential economic output is not produced because of alcohol effects and this category of losses (referred to as ‘indirect costs’) encompasses premature mortality, inability to work, decreased productivity and incarceration [8,9,10,11]. Some studies also attempt to attribute economic value to pain, suffering and the decline in the quality of life due to alcohol (‘intangible costs’) [12,13]; however, this cost category does not represent either the real or potential loss of material resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the last 15 years, several systematic reviews on the economic impact of alcohol consumption [4,8,10,14], heavy drinking and alcohol dependence [9,15] have been published. Studies from individual states include both estimates from high-income countries (e.g., Belgium [12,16], the United States [11,17], Germany [18,19,20], the United Kingdom [13,21], Estonia [22] and Portugal [23]) and middle-income states (e.g., Russia [24], Sri Lanka [25] and Thailand [26]). Despite this abundance of evidence, the comparability of findings from particular countries is extremely limited because of methodological heterogeneity (different definitions, data sources, cost categories and calculation methods), resulting in a broad range of estimates [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifth, the sensitivity analysis exhibits large variation in the estimates, particularly for the minimum productivity adjustment and different discount rates used. The choice of discount rate itself is another problem; some researchers argue that discounting should not be used in premature mortality cost analyses [47]. Finally, as this analysis spans to several decades towards the future (up to 2080), the assumptions made about future economic conditions (GDP growth, labour market trends) are fairly uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended that future studies examining the economic impact of overweight or obesity also examine the intangible costs to catch the full economic burden [ 48 ]. It can be suggested to determine non-financial welfare costs using disability adjusted life years (DALYs) [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%