2011
DOI: 10.1177/1090198110372332
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Healthy Teen Girls Project: Comparison of Health Education and STD Risk Reduction Intervention for Incarcerated Adolescent Females

Abstract: Adolescent girls incarcerated in a state reformatory (N=246) were recruited and assigned to an 18-session health education program or a time-equivalent HIV prevention program. Cohorts were assigned to conditions using a randomized block design separated by a “wash out” period to reduce contamination. Post intervention, girls in the HIV risk reduction program demonstrated the acquisition of risk-reduction behavioral skills and improved condom application skill. At a follow-up assessment approximately nine month… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Robertson et al RCT, 46 adolescent females were randomised into either a health education programme or a HIV risk reduction intervention. Sexual risk behaviour was assessed after release 31. Both groups maintained rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia between 17%–20% while detained and at the 9-month follow-up after release.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Robertson et al RCT, 46 adolescent females were randomised into either a health education programme or a HIV risk reduction intervention. Sexual risk behaviour was assessed after release 31. Both groups maintained rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia between 17%–20% while detained and at the 9-month follow-up after release.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also report a high prevalence of risk factors associated with STIs and HIV infection, such as family dysfunction, trauma and sexual abuse, mental health and substance abuse problems, and risky sexual behaviors. (Chesney-Lind and Sheldon 1998; Teplin et al 2006; Lederman et al 2004; Robertson et al 2011; Voisin et al 2012). For example, one study identified 73% of adolescent girls entering the juvenile justice system with a history of sexual abuse (Chesney-Lind and Sheldon 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Still, few HIV prevention programs have targeted juvenile offenders (Tolou-Shams, Stewart, Fasciano, & Brown, 2010), and among those that have, published reports have yielded small effects on behavior, low retention rates (Bryan et al., 2009; Goldberg et al, 2009; Robertson et al, 2011; Rosengard et al, 2007; Schmiege, Broaddus, Levin, & Bryan, 2009; Tolou-Shams et al, 2011), and intervention decay (Tolou-Shams et al, 2010). By contrast, a review of HIV prevention interventions for juvenile offenders concluded that changes in theoretical mediators of risk (e.g., HIV knowledge and attitudes) are consistently strong (Tolou-Shams et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%