2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10686-013-9352-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Herschel-PACS photometer calibration

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
200
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.6 of Men'shchikov et al 2012). Aperture corrections are applied by getsources using tables of the encircled energy fraction values for the actual point spread functions (PSFs) provided by the PACS and SPIRE ICCs (Balog et al 2014;Bendo et al 2013).…”
Section: Multiwavelength Core Extraction With Getsourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2.6 of Men'shchikov et al 2012). Aperture corrections are applied by getsources using tables of the encircled energy fraction values for the actual point spread functions (PSFs) provided by the PACS and SPIRE ICCs (Balog et al 2014;Bendo et al 2013).…”
Section: Multiwavelength Core Extraction With Getsourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first run the 70 μm data point was included in the fit and the getsources 13 The photometric point-source calibration uncertainty is less than 7% for the PACS bands (Balog et al 2014) and ∼5% for the SPIRE bands (Bendo et al 2013). …”
Section: Derived Core Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its resulting flux of 52.8 mJy is 13% lower than the average 60.9 mJy from the two scan maps. Here we should note that the annulus used for background determination is closer to the source and narrower for chop/nod aperture photometry (radius 24 -28 , Nielbock et al (2013)) than for scan map photometry (radius 35 -45 , Balog et al (2014)). As we discuss in Sect.…”
Section: Appendix C: Comparison Scan Map With Chop/nod Photometrymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The data reduction and calibration performed in HIPE 1 (Ott 2010) followed the description in Balog et al (2014), applying the high-pass filter (HPF) algorithm to remove the 1 f -noise Table 2. Relevant scan map parameters for photometry and noise determination.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the Level-1 stage, the observations were first corrected for the evaporator temperature effect (see Moór et al 2014) with correction factors of <0.3% to 3.2%. Then we followed the standard pipeline steps to eliminate the 1/f noise as described in Balog et al (2014) using iterative masked high-pass filtering of the observational timelines with the photProject(). For large scale, extended emission studies, the mapmaker algorithm JScanam is often more suitable, but in our case the structures were kept in the inner ∼30 of the source, so there was no need to use JScanam to deal with a broadened PSF.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%